PRIVET: PRoximIty leakage detection Via Extreme value Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep generative models are often trained on sensitive data, such as genetic sequences, health data, or more broadly, any copyrighted, licensed or protected content. This raises critical concerns around privacy-preserving synthetic data, and more specifically around privacy leakage, an issue closely tied to overfitting. Existing proximity-based methods mostly assess privacy risk through global criteria, which quantify a model's overall behaviour but cannot attribute risk to an individual record. Sample-level outputs do exist but they are either uncalibrated, discontinuous, or blind to leakage occurring while the model is globally underfit, which limits their practical use. Using extreme value statistics on nearest-neighbor distances, we propose PRIVET, a generic sample-based, modality-agnostic algorithm that assigns an individual proximity leak score to each synthetic sample. These are evaluated under a chosen representation and distance, each synthetic sample being assigned a continuous score measuring how improbable its proximity to the training set is under a no-leakage model. We empirically demonstrate that PRIVET detects memorization and more subtle forms of proximity-based data leakage across diverse data modalities, including settings with very high dimensionality and limited sample sizes such as genetic data, and in underfitting regimes that overfitting-based diagnostics cannot reach by construction. Our analysis further shows that the representation bounds what any distance-based evaluation can detect, existing computer vision embeddings failing to yield perceptually meaningful distances for near-duplicate samples. Accordingly, a low score is evidence of leakage in the chosen metric, while its absence is not a certificate of privacy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2025.
Builds on
14 of 34 references.
References · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,161
- 2023Exposing flaws of generative model evaluation metrics and their unfair treatment of diffusion modelscited by 199
- 2021How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Modelscited by 193
- 2023PFGM++: Unlocking the Potential of Physics-Inspired Generative Modelscited by 73
- 2020A Non-Parametric Test to Detect Data-Copying in Generative Modelscited by 52
- 2023Feature Likelihood Divergence: Evaluating the Generalization of Generative Models Using Samplescited by 25
- 2021Bounding Information Leakage in Machine Learningcited by 11
- 2023Fr'echet Wavelet Distance: A Domain-Agnostic Metric for Image Generationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.