Improving Visual Discriminability of CLIP for Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extending CLIP models to semantic segmentation remains challenging due to the misalignment between their image-level pre-training objectives and the pixel-level visual understanding required for dense prediction. While prior efforts have achieved encouraging results by reorganizing the final layer and features, they often inherit the global alignment bias of preceding layers, leading to suboptimal segmentation performance. In this work, we propose LHT-CLIP, a novel training-free framework that systematically exploits the visual discriminability of CLIP across layer, head, and token levels. Through comprehensive analysis, we reveal three key insights: (i) the final layers primarily strengthen image-text alignment with sacrifice of visual discriminability (e.g., last 3 layers in ViT-B/16 and 8 layers in ViT-L/14), partly due to the emergence of anomalous tokens; (ii) a subset of attention heads (e.g., 10 out of 144 in ViT-B/16) display consistently strong visual discriminability across datasets; (iii) abnormal tokens display sparse and consistent activation pattern compared to normal tokens. Based on these findings, we propose three complementary techniques: semantic-spatial reweighting, selective head enhancement, and abnormal token replacement to effectively restore visual discriminability and improve segmentation performance without any additional training, auxiliary pre-trained networks, or extensive hyperparameter tuning. Extensive experiments on 8 common semantic segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that LHT-CLIP achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse scenarios, highlighting its effectiveness and practicality for real-world deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.
Builds on
55 of 71 references.
References · 55
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,418
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,152
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,173
- 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 864
38 more
- 2021Extract Free Dense Labels from CLIPcited by 583
- 2022Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Mask-adapted CLIPcited by 565
- 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 532
- 2022GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervisioncited by 531
- 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modelingcited by 431
- 2023Open-Vocabulary Panoptic Segmentation with Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 375
- 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 326
- 2021VL-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 320
- 2021A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Featurescited by 227
- 2021A Simple Baseline for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Pre-trained Vision-language Modelcited by 223
- 2023CAT-Seg: Cost Aggregation for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 219
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2023SCLIP: Rethinking Self-Attention for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 170
- 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
- 2022SegCLIP: Patch Aggregation with Learnable Centers for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 164
- 2022Learning to Generate Text-grounded Mask for Open-world Semantic Segmentation from Only Image-Text Pairscited by 130
- 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Modelscited by 123
- 2022ReCo: Retrieve and Co-segment for Zero-shot Transfercited by 117
- 2022Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation with Patch Aligned Contrastive Learningcited by 115
- 2024ClearCLIP: Decomposing CLIP Representations for Dense Vision-Language Inferencecited by 113
- 2024ProxyCLIP: Proxy Attention Improves CLIP for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 111
- 2023Learning Open-vocabulary Semantic Segmentation Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 99
- 2022On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Featurescited by 97
- 2023CLIP-DINOiser: Teaching CLIP a few DINO tricks for open-vocabulary semantic segmentationcited by 96
- 2023Grounding Everything: Emerging Localization Properties in Vision-Language Transformerscited by 91
- 2025Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Groundingcited by 83
- 2024Pay Attention to Your Neighbours: Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
- 2022Can Language Understand Depth?cited by 69
- 2023A Closer Look at the Few-Shot Adaptation of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 67
- 2024Explore the Potential of CLIP for Training-Free Open Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 61
- 2023ViewCo: Discovering Text-Supervised Segmentation Masks via Multi-View Semantic Consistencycited by 51
- 2024Harnessing Vision Foundation Models for High-Performance, Training-Free Open Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 39
- 2024In Defense of Lazy Visual Grounding for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 38
- 2024CorrCLIP: Reconstructing Patch Correlations in CLIP for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 34
- 2024Self-Calibrated CLIP for Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 34
- 2024ResCLIP: Residual Attention for Training-free Dense Vision-language Inferencecited by 29
- 2023Uncovering Prototypical Knowledge for Weakly Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentationcited by 27
- 2023Rewrite Caption Semantics: Bridging Semantic Gaps for Language-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 21
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.