Complexity Dependent Error Rates for Physics-informed Statistical Learning via the Small-ball Method
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed statistical learning (PISL) integrates empirical data with physical knowledge to enhance the statistical performance of estimators. While PISL methods are widely used in practice, a comprehensive theoretical understanding of how informed regularization affects statistical properties is still missing. Specifically, two fundamental questions have yet to be fully addressed: (1) what is the trade-off between considering soft penalties versus hard constraints, and (2) what is the statistical gain of incorporating physical knowledge compared to purely data-driven empirical error minimisation. In this paper, we address these questions for PISL in convex classes of functions under physical knowledge expressed as linear equations by developing appropriate complexity dependent error rates based on the small-ball method. We show that, under suitable assumptions, (1) the error rates of physics-informed estimators are comparable to those of hard constrained empirical error minimisers, differing only by constant terms, and that (2) informed penalization can effectively reduce model complexity, akin to dimensionality reduction, thereby improving learning performance. This work establishes a theoretical framework for evaluating the statistical properties of physics-informed estimators in convex classes of functions, contributing to closing the gap between statistical theory and practical PISL, with potential applications to cases not yet explored in the literature.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2025.
Builds on
15 of 46 references.
References · 15
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
- 2019Informed Machine Learning -- A Taxonomy and Survey of Integrating Knowledge into Learning Systemscited by 203
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating PDEscited by 115
- 2022Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in supersonic flowscited by 75
- 2022When Physics Meets Machine Learning: A Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 64
- 2022Error estimates for physics informed neural networks approximating the Navier-Stokes equationscited by 63
- 2021When Do Extended Physics-Informed Neural Networks (XPINNs) Improve Generalization?cited by 57
- 2021Error analysis for physics informed neural networks (PINNs) approximating Kolmogorov PDEscited by 56
- 2014Learning without Concentrationcited by 50
- 2013Relative Deviation Learning Bounds and Generalization with Unbounded Loss Functionscited by 15
- 2014Learning without Concentration for General Loss Functionscited by 13
- 2024Physics-informed machine learning as a kernel methodcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.