Convex AI Compositionality and the Governance of AI System Populations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
AI governance increasingly requires providers and public authorities to reason about multiple AI instantiations, alternative versions, and deployment configurations of multiple AI systems. Yet current regulation remains predominantly single-system-centric, acknowledging such multiplicity only sparsely without treating collections of related AI systems as governance objects. This creates an AI population governance problem: determining which instantiations can be meaningfully considered together and how their changing configurations can be represented and monitored. The first requirement has recently been addressed through trustworthiness-based accounts of AI identity. We address the second by introducing convex AI compositionality: a formal representation of the configurations generated by finite AI system populations that uses convex spaces. The core idea is that convex compositions of the operational states that a population of AI system instantiations may occupy over time are compatible with lifecycle reachability across the population and can preserve the formal identity relations between these systems. Well-known statistical and geometric constructions, such as weighted state distributions and convex hulls, become AI governance tools for distinguishing operational states, population weights, heterogeneity, and AI configuration change across different governance modes while remaining compatible, under stated conditions, with lifecycle reachability and AI identity. We illustrate our AI population governance framework through distributed healthcare deployments and controlled deployment of recruitment AI variants.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.
Builds on
10 of 24 references.
References · 10
- 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
- 2022Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecturecited by 126
- 2023Connecting the Dots in Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI Principles, Ethics, and Key Requirements to Responsible AI Systems and Regulationcited by 60
- 2026Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliabilitycited by 58
- 2022Fleet-DAgger: Interactive Robot Fleet Learning with Scalable Human Supervisioncited by 29
- 2023Robot Fleet Learning via Policy Mergingcited by 11
- 2022Rapid Regression Detection in Software Deployments through Sequential Testingcited by 7
- 2025Understanding AI Trustworthiness: A Scoping Review of AIES & FAccT Articlescited by 6
- 2026A Category Theory Account of AI Identitycited by 2
- 2026A Methodology for Auditable Trustworthiness Levels in AI Lifecycle Governancecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.