From Information to Generative Exponent: Learning Rate Induces Phase Transitions in SGD
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To understand feature learning dynamics in neural networks, recent theoretical works have focused on gradient-based learning of Gaussian single-index models, where the label is a nonlinear function of a latent one-dimensional projection of the input. While the sample complexity of online SGD is determined by the information exponent of the link function, recent works improved this by performing multiple gradient steps on the same sample with different learning rates -- yielding a non-correlational update rule -- and instead are limited by the (potentially much smaller) generative exponent. However, this picture is only valid when these learning rates are sufficiently large. In this paper, we characterize the relationship between learning rate(s) and sample complexity for a broad class of gradient-based algorithms that encapsulates both correlational and non-correlational updates. We demonstrate that, in certain cases, there is a phase transition from an "information exponent regime" with small learning rate to a "generative exponent regime" with large learning rate. Our framework covers prior analyses of one-pass SGD and SGD with batch reuse, while also introducing a new layer-wise training algorithm that leverages a two-timescales approach (via different learning rates for each layer) to go beyond correlational queries without reusing samples or modifying the loss from squared error. Our theoretical study demonstrates that the choice of learning rate is as important as the design of the algorithm in achieving statistical and computational efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
43 of 56 references.
References · 43
- 2021Gradient Descent on Neural Networks Typically Occurs at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 427
- 2020The large learning rate phase of deep learning: the catapult mechanismcited by 216
- 2019Towards Explaining the Regularization Effect of Initial Large Learning Rate in Training Neural Networkscited by 162
- 2022Neural Networks can Learn Representations with Gradient Descentcited by 161
- 2022High-dimensional Asymptotics of Feature Learning: How One Gradient Step Improves the Representationcited by 150
- 2020Implicit Gradient Regularizationcited by 146
- 2023SGD learning on neural networks: leap complexity and saddle-to-saddle dynamicscited by 143
- 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
- 2022Learning Single-Index Models with Shallow Neural Networkscited by 92
- 2022SGD with Large Step Sizes Learns Sparse Featurescited by 68
- 2023How Two-Layer Neural Networks Learn, One (Giant) Step at a Timecited by 68
- 2020Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts Generalizationcited by 62
31 more
- 2023Smoothing the Landscape Boosts the Signal for SGD: Optimal Sample Complexity for Learning Single Index Modelscited by 61
- 2023Learning time-scales in two-layers neural networkscited by 57
- 2023On Learning Gaussian Multi-index Models with Gradient Flowcited by 57
- 2024The Benefits of Reusing Batches for Gradient Descent in Two-Layer Networks: Breaking the Curse of Information and Leap Exponentscited by 52
- 2024Neural network learns low-dimensional polynomials with SGD near the information-theoretic limitcited by 46
- 2024Computational-Statistical Gaps in Gaussian Single-Index Modelscited by 44
- 2024Repetita Iuvant: Data Repetition Allows SGD to Learn High-Dimensional Multi-Index Functionscited by 37
- 2020Learning Polynomials of Few Relevant Dimensionscited by 34
- 2023Gradient-Based Feature Learning under Structured Datacited by 32
- 2025Emergence and scaling laws in SGD learning of shallow neural networkscited by 32
- 2025Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling lawscited by 25
- 2020Statistical Queries and Statistical Algorithms: Foundations and Applicationscited by 22
- 2023Leveraging the two timescale regime to demonstrate convergence of neural networkscited by 19
- 2024Fundamental computational limits of weak learnability in high-dimensional multi-index modelscited by 19
- 2024Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Non-Homogeneous Two-Layer Networks: Margin Improvement and Fast Optimizationcited by 17
- 2024On the Complexity of Learning Sparse Functions with Statistical and Gradient Queriescited by 15
- 2024Learning Multi-Index Models with Neural Networks via Mean-Field Langevin Dynamicscited by 15
- 2024Learning sum of diverse features: computational hardness and efficient gradient-based training for ridge combinationscited by 13
- 2024Sliding down the stairs: how correlated latent variables accelerate learning with neural networkscited by 12
- 2025On The Concurrence of Layer-wise Preconditioning Methods and Provable Feature Learningcited by 12
- 2024Learning Gaussian Multi-Index Models with Gradient Flow: Time Complexity and Directional Convergencecited by 9
- 2025Low-dimensional Functions are Efficiently Learnable under Randomly Biased Distributionscited by 8
- 2025Learning single-index models via harmonic decompositioncited by 7
- 2024Mean-Field Langevin Dynamics for Signed Measures via a Bilevel Approachcited by 6
- 2024Learning Orthogonal Multi-Index Models: A Fine-Grained Information Exponent Analysiscited by 6
- 2025Provable Benefits of Unsupervised Pre-training and Transfer Learning via Single-Index Modelscited by 6
- 2024Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensionscited by 5
- 2024Robust Feature Learning for Multi-Index Models in High Dimensionscited by 5
- 2025Ultra-fast feature learning for the training of two-layer neural networks in the two-timescale regimecited by 5
- 2025Learning a Single Index Model from Anisotropic Data with vanilla Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 4
- 2024Online Learning and Information Exponents: On The Importance of Batch size, and Time/Complexity Tradeoffscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.