Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While it is commonly observed in practice that pruning networks to a certain level of sparsity can improve the quality of the features, a theoretical explanation of this phenomenon remains elusive. In this work, we investigate this by demonstrating that a broad class of statistical models can be optimally learned using pruned neural networks trained with gradient descent, in high-dimensions. We consider learning both single-index and multi-index models of the form y = σ^*(boldsymbolVtop boldsymbolx) + ε, where σ^* is a degree-p polynomial, and boldsymbolV ∈ mathbbmRd × r with r ll d, is the matrix containing relevant model directions. We assume that boldsymbolV satisfies a certain ℓq-sparsity condition for matrices and show that pruning neural networks proportional to the sparsity level of boldsymbolV improves their sample complexity compared to unpruned networks. Furthermore, we establish Correlational Statistical Query (CSQ) lower bounds in this setting, which take the sparsity level of boldsymbolV into account. We show that if the sparsity level of boldsymbolV exceeds a certain threshold, training pruned networks with a gradient descent algorithm achieves the sample complexity suggested by the CSQ lower bound. In the same scenario, however, our results imply that basis-independent methods such as models trained via standard gradient descent initialized with rotationally invariant random weights can provably achieve only suboptimal sample complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.
Builds on
4 of 55 references.
References · 4
- 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 471
- 2024The Benefits of Reusing Batches for Gradient Descent in Two-Layer Networks: Breaking the Curse of Information and Leap Exponentscited by 50
- 2019Disentangling feature and lazy training in deep neural networkscited by 10
- 2024No Free Prune: Information-Theoretic Barriers to Pruning at Initializationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Learning Multi-Index Models with Neural Networks via Mean-Field Langevin Dynamicscited by 14
- 2024Robust Feature Learning for Multi-Index Models in High Dimensionscited by 5
- 2025On the creation of narrow AI: hierarchy and nonlocality of neural network skillscited by 4
- 2025From Information to Generative Exponent: Learning Rate Induces Phase Transitions in SGDcited by 2
- 2025From Information to Generative Exponent: Learning Rate Induces Phase Transitions in SGD23 Oct 2025
- 2025On the creation of narrow AI: hierarchy and nonlocality of neural network skills21 May 2025
- 2024Robust Feature Learning for Multi-Index Models in High Dimensions21 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning Multi-Index Models with Neural Networks via Mean-Field Langevin Dynamics14 Aug 2024