mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Metadata Extraction Leveraging Large Language Models

arXiv 2510.19334 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2025stat.ML cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of Large Language Models has revolutionized tasks across domains, including the automation of legal document analysis, a critical component of modern contract management systems. This paper presents a comprehensive implementation of LLM-enhanced metadata extraction for contract review, focusing on the automatic detection and annotation of salient legal clauses. Leveraging both the publicly available Contract Understanding Atticus Dataset (CUAD) and proprietary contract datasets, our work demonstrates the integration of advanced LLM methodologies with practical applications. We identify three pivotal elements for optimizing metadata extraction: robust text conversion, strategic chunk selection, and advanced LLM-specific techniques, including Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting and structured tool calling. The results from our experiments highlight the substantial improvements in clause identification accuracy and efficiency. Our approach shows promise in reducing the time and cost associated with contract review while maintaining high accuracy in legal clause identification. The results suggest that carefully optimized LLM systems could serve as valuable tools for legal professionals, potentially increasing access to efficient contract review services for organizations of all sizes.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2025.

Builds on

3 of 17 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 232
  2. 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Textscited by 32
  3. 2020An Automated Framework for the Extraction of Semantic Legal Metadata from Legal Textscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ContractScrub: A benchmark for final review of legal contracts
  2. 2025Streamlining Industrial Contract Management with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
  3. 2026A Few Good Clauses: Comparing LLMs vs Domain-Trained Small Language Models on Structured Contract Extraction
  4. 2026De Jure: Iterative LLM Self-Refinement for Structured Extraction of Regulatory Rules
  5. 2024Automating IRAC Analysis in Malaysian Contract Law using a Semi-Structured Knowledge Base
  6. 2026Gavel: Agent Meets Checklist for Evaluating LLMs on Long-Context Legal Summarization
  7. 2026Data Augmented Pipeline for Legal Information Extraction and Reasoning
  8. 2025Better Call CLAUSE: A Discrepancy Benchmark for Auditing LLMs Legal Reasoning Capabilities