An Automated Framework for the Extraction of Semantic Legal Metadata from Legal Texts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semantic legal metadata provides information that helps with understanding and interpreting legal provisions. Such metadata is therefore important for the systematic analysis of legal requirements. However, manually enhancing a large legal corpus with semantic metadata is prohibitively expensive. Our work is motivated by two observations: (1) the existing requirements engineering (RE) literature does not provide a harmonized view on the semantic metadata types that are useful for legal requirements analysis; (2) automated support for the extraction of semantic legal metadata is scarce, and it does not exploit the full potential of artificial intelligence technologies, notably natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). Our objective is to take steps toward overcoming these limitations. To do so, we review and reconcile the semantic legal metadata types proposed in the RE literature. Subsequently, we devise an automated extraction approach for the identified metadata types using NLP and ML. We evaluate our approach through two case studies over the Luxembourgish legislation. Our results indicate a high accuracy in the generation of metadata annotations. In particular, in the two case studies, we were able to obtain precision scores of 97.2% and 82.4% and recall scores of 94.9% and 92.4%.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Pre-Trained Language Models for Keyphrase Prediction: A Reviewcited by 3
- 2023Legal Requirements Analysiscited by 2
- 2024Extracting Norms from Contracts Via ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challengescited by 2
- 2024Leveraging Encoder-only Large Language Models for Mobile App Review Feature Extractioncited by 2
- 2025Legal Requirements Translation from Lawcited by 1
- 2025Metadata Extraction Leveraging Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026MiNER: A Two-Stage Pipeline for Metadata Extraction from Municipal Meeting Minutescited by 0
- 2026From Regulation to Requirements: An Automated Requirement Derivation and Explanation Pipelinecited by 0
- 2026From Regulation to Requirements: An Automated Requirement Derivation and Explanation Pipeline5 Jul 2026
- 2026MiNER: A Two-Stage Pipeline for Metadata Extraction from Municipal Meeting Minutes30 Jan 2026
- 2025Metadata Extraction Leveraging Large Language Models22 Oct 2025
- 2025Legal Requirements Translation from Law3 Jul 2025
- 2024Pre-Trained Language Models for Keyphrase Prediction: A Review2 Sep 2024
- 2024Leveraging Encoder-only Large Language Models for Mobile App Review Feature Extraction2 Aug 2024
- 2024Extracting Norms from Contracts Via ChatGPT: Opportunities and Challenges2 Apr 2024
- 2023Legal Requirements Analysis23 Nov 2023