mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rewarding the Journey, Not Just the Destination: A Composite Path and Answer Self-Scoring Reward Mechanism for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2510.17923 ↗First posted 20 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for advancing Large Language Models (LLMs), achieving remarkable performance in complex reasoning domains such as mathematics and code generation. However, current RL methods face a fundamental scalability bottleneck due to their heavy reliance on human-curated preference data or labeled datasets for reward modeling. To overcome this limitation, we explore RL on unlabeled data where models learn autonomously from continuous experience streams. The core challenge in this setting lies in reliable reward estimation without ground-truth supervision. Existing approaches like Test-Time RL address this through self-consistent consensus, but risk reinforcing incorrect pseudo-labels derived from majority voting. We introduce COMPASS (Composite Path and Answer Self-Scoring), a novel test-time reward mechanism that operates without external supervision. COMPASS integrates two complementary components: the Dual-Calibration Answer Reward (DCAR), which stabilizes training by establishing trustworthy pseudo-labels through confidence and credibility calibration, and the Decisive Path Reward (DPR), which directly optimizes the reasoning process quality beyond mere outcome supervision. By jointly reinforcing trustworthy consensus answers and highly decisive reasoning chains, the COMPASS systematically enhances the model's analytical capabilities. Extensive experiments show that COMPASS achieves significant and consistent performance gains across diverse reasoning tasks and model architectures, advancing a more scalable direction for LLMs to learn from continuous experience.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2025.

Builds on

29 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Free Process Rewards without Process Labels2 Dec
  2. 2024On Designing Effective RL Reward at Training Time for LLM Reasoning19 Oct

Other references · 27

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  6. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  8. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  9. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  10. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  11. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  12. 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 323
15 more
  1. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 265
  2. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learningcited by 253
  3. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 236
  4. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
  5. 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
  6. 2025Right Question is Already Half the Answer: Fully Unsupervised LLM Reasoning Incentivizationcited by 124
  7. 2024RL on Incorrect Synthetic Data Scales the Efficiency of LLM Math Reasoning by Eight-Foldcited by 99
  8. 2024Enhancing Code LLMs with Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation: A Surveycited by 82
  9. 2017AutoDIAL: Automatic DomaIn Alignment Layerscited by 75
  10. 2025Self-rewarding correction for mathematical reasoningcited by 67
  11. 2025Confidence Is All You Need: Few-Shot RL Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 61
  12. 2025Overconfidence in LLM-as-a-Judge: Diagnosis and Confidence-Driven Solutioncited by 17
  13. 2024LLM-Powered Code Vulnerability Repair with Reinforcement Learning and Semantic Rewardcited by 16
  14. 2024Self-Evolved Reward Learning for LLMscited by 16
  15. 2025The Confidence Paradox: Can LLM Know When It's Wrongcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient Reasoners
  2. 2025Reward Reasoning Model
  3. 2025Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
  4. 2025Post-Training Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning from Self-Feedback
  5. 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domains
  6. 2025Breaking the Self-Confirming Loop: Diagnosing and Mitigating Systemic Reward Bias in Self-Rewarding RL
  7. 2025Co-rewarding: Stable Self-supervised RL for Eliciting Reasoning in Large Language Models
  8. 2025SERL: Self-Examining Reinforcement Learning on Open-Domain