Verifiable Fine-Tuning for LLMs: Zero-Knowledge Training Proofs Bound to Data Provenance and Policy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are often adapted through parameter efficient fine tuning, but current release practices provide weak assurances about what data were used and how updates were computed. We present Verifiable Fine Tuning, a protocol and system that produces succinct zero knowledge proofs that a released model was obtained from a public initialization under a declared training program and an auditable dataset commitment. The approach combines five elements. First, commitments that bind data sources, preprocessing, licenses, and per epoch quota counters to a manifest. Second, a verifiable sampler that supports public replayable and private index hiding batch selection. Third, update circuits restricted to parameter efficient fine tuning that enforce AdamW style optimizer semantics and proof friendly approximations with explicit error budgets. Fourth, recursive aggregation that folds per step proofs into per epoch and end to end certificates with millisecond verification. Fifth, provenance binding and optional trusted execution property cards that attest code identity and constants. On English and bilingual instruction mixtures, the method maintains utility within tight budgets while achieving practical proof performance. Policy quotas are enforced with zero violations, and private sampling windows show no measurable index leakage. Federated experiments demonstrate that the system composes with probabilistic audits and bandwidth constraints. These results indicate that end to end verifiable fine tuning is feasible today for real parameter efficient pipelines, closing a critical trust gap for regulated and decentralized deployments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2025.
Builds on
29 of 65 references.
References · 29
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 321
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 299
- 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 189
- 2023Tree-Ring Watermarks: Fingerprints for Diffusion Images that are Invisible and Robustcited by 187
- 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 84
- 2023On the Learnability of Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 81
- 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2024Provably Robust Multi-bit Watermarking for AI-generated Textcited by 47
- 2022Verifiable and Provably Secure Machine Unlearningcited by 25
17 more
- 2023Tools for Verifying Neural Models' Training Datacited by 22
- 2025A Survey of Zero-Knowledge Proof Based Verifiable Machine Learningcited by 22
- 2023zkDL: Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Deep Learning Trainingcited by 20
- 2025Learning from Heterogeneity: Generalizing Dynamic Facial Expression Recognition via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 19
- 2024WiOpen: A Robust Wi-Fi-based Open-set Gesture Recognition Frameworkcited by 16
- 2025Model Provenance Testing for Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2023ReSup: Reliable Label Noise Suppression for Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 14
- 2024Large Language Model Watermark Stealing With Mixed Integer Programmingcited by 14
- 2022ezDPS: An Efficient and Zero-Knowledge Machine Learning Inference Pipelinecited by 10
- 2024Laminator: Verifiable ML Property Cards using Hardware-assisted Attestationscited by 10
- 2025FedQuad: Adaptive Layer-wise LoRA Deployment and Activation Quantization for Federated Fine-Tuningcited by 10
- 2025Accelerating Mixture-of-Expert Inference with Adaptive Expert Split Mechanismcited by 9
- 2024Accelerating End-Cloud Collaborative Inference via Near Bubble-free Pipeline Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting with Adaptive Transformer Block Expansion in Federated Fine-Tuningcited by 7
- 2025Towards Communication-Efficient Decentralized Federated Graph Learning over Non-IID Datacited by 6
- 2023Attesting Distributional Properties of Training Data for Machine Learningcited by 5
- 2024Proof-of-Learning with Incentive Securitycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.