mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attesting Distributional Properties of Training Data for Machine Learning

arXiv 2308.09552 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2023cs.CR cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The success of machine learning (ML) has been accompanied by increased concerns about its trustworthiness. Several jurisdictions are preparing ML regulatory frameworks. One such concern is ensuring that model training data has desirable distributional properties for certain sensitive attributes. For example, draft regulations indicate that model trainers are required to show that training datasets have specific distributional properties, such as reflecting diversity of the population. We propose the notion of property attestation allowing a prover (e.g., model trainer) to demonstrate relevant distributional properties of training data to a verifier (e.g., a customer) without revealing the data. We present an effective hybrid property attestation combining property inference with cryptographic mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2023.

Builds on

30 of 76 references.

References · 30

  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  2. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  3. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  4. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
  5. 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
  6. 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 128
  7. 2020Unleashing the Tiger: Inference Attacks on Split Learningcited by 104
  8. 2021Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practicecited by 81
  9. 2018Chameleon: A Hybrid Secure Computation Framework for Machine Learning Applicationscited by 67
  10. 2021Property Inference From Poisoningcited by 56
  11. 2020Leakage of Dataset Properties in Multi-Party Machine Learningcited by 46
  12. 2021Formalizing and Estimating Distribution Inference Riskscited by 42
18 more
  1. 2018Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributescited by 41
  2. 2021Property Inference Attacks Against GANscited by 32
  3. 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
  4. 2022SNAP: Efficient Extraction of Private Properties with Poisoningcited by 29
  5. 2019The Audio Auditor: User-Level Membership Inference in Internet of Things Voice Servicescited by 25
  6. 2022Verifiable and Provably Secure Machine Unlearningcited by 24
  7. 2021"Adversarial Examples" for Proof-of-Learningcited by 19
  8. 2022Distribution inference risks: Identifying and mitigating sources of leakagecited by 17
  9. 2020Have you forgotten? A method to assess if machine learning models have forgotten datacited by 16
  10. 2020Fairness in the Eyes of the Data: Certifying Machine-Learning Modelscited by 16
  11. 2021Secure Quantized Training for Deep Learningcited by 15
  12. 2022Dissecting Distribution Inferencecited by 15
  13. 2022Proof-of-Learning is Currently More Broken Than You Thinkcited by 12
  14. 2022Protecting Global Properties of Datasets with Distribution Privacy Mechanismscited by 11
  15. 2018Local Obfuscation Mechanisms for Hiding Probability Distributionscited by 8
  16. 2021EMA: Auditing Data Removal from Trained Modelscited by 7
  17. 2022Black-Box Audits for Group Distribution Shiftscited by 5
  18. 2021Formalizing Distribution Inference Riskscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.