VIPAMIN: Visual Prompt Initialization via Embedding Selection and Subspace Expansion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the era of large-scale foundation models, fully fine-tuning pretrained networks for each downstream task is often prohibitively resource-intensive. Prompt tuning offers a lightweight alternative by introducing tunable prompts while keeping the backbone frozen. However, existing visual prompt tuning methods often fail to specialize the prompts or enrich the representation space--especially when applied to self-supervised backbones. We show that these limitations become especially pronounced in challenging tasks and data-scarce settings, where effective adaptation is most critical. In this work, we introduce VIPAMIN, a visual prompt initialization strategy that enhances adaptation of self-supervised models by (1) aligning prompts with semantically informative regions in the embedding space, and (2) injecting novel representational directions beyond the pretrained subspace. Despite its simplicity--requiring only a single forward pass and lightweight operations--VIPAMIN consistently improves performance across diverse tasks and dataset sizes, setting a new state of the art in visual prompt tuning. Our code is available at https://github.com/iamjaekyun/vipamin.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
54 of 77 references.
References · 54
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
38 more
- 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
- 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
- 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
- 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
- 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
- 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
- 2021Hierarchical Transformers Are More Efficient Language Modelscited by 102
- 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
- 2022Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?cited by 76
- 2021On Transferability of Prompt Tuning for Natural Language Processingcited by 75
- 2016DeepMind Labcited by 74
- 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
- 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
- 2023Read-only Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Few-shot Learningcited by 58
- 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
- 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
- 2023On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuningcited by 50
- 2022Teaching Matters: Investigating the Role of Supervision in Vision Transformerscited by 45
- 2023When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitationscited by 43
- 2024Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuningcited by 32
- 2022A Closer Look at Self-Supervised Lightweight Vision Transformerscited by 31
- 2023Universality and Limitations of Prompt Tuningcited by 30
- 2024Visual Fourier Prompt Tuningcited by 30
- 2023Steering Prototypes with Prompt-tuning for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 22
- 2024A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classificationcited by 19
- 2022Towards Unified Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Text Classificationcited by 18
- 2025DA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision Transformerscited by 17
- 2024Prompt as Free Lunch: Enhancing Diversity in Source-Free Cross-domain Few-shot Learning through Semantic-Guided Promptingcited by 10
- 2023Do We Really Need a Large Number of Visual Prompts?cited by 9
50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.