mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VIPAMIN: Visual Prompt Initialization via Embedding Selection and Subspace Expansion

arXiv 2510.16446 ↗First posted 18 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the era of large-scale foundation models, fully fine-tuning pretrained networks for each downstream task is often prohibitively resource-intensive. Prompt tuning offers a lightweight alternative by introducing tunable prompts while keeping the backbone frozen. However, existing visual prompt tuning methods often fail to specialize the prompts or enrich the representation space--especially when applied to self-supervised backbones. We show that these limitations become especially pronounced in challenging tasks and data-scarce settings, where effective adaptation is most critical. In this work, we introduce VIPAMIN, a visual prompt initialization strategy that enhances adaptation of self-supervised models by (1) aligning prompts with semantically informative regions in the embedding space, and (2) injecting novel representational directions beyond the pretrained subspace. Despite its simplicity--requiring only a single forward pass and lightweight operations--VIPAMIN consistently improves performance across diverse tasks and dataset sizes, setting a new state of the art in visual prompt tuning. Our code is available at https://github.com/iamjaekyun/vipamin.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.

Builds on

54 of 77 references.

References · 54

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  7. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  8. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  10. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  11. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  12. 2021An Empirical Study of Training Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1,616
38 more
  1. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  2. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  3. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  4. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
  6. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
  7. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  8. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
  9. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  10. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  11. 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
  12. 2021SPoT: Better Frozen Model Adaptation through Soft Prompt Transfercited by 235
  13. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  14. 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
  15. 2022Neural Prompt Searchcited by 135
  16. 2021Hierarchical Transformers Are More Efficient Language Modelscited by 102
  17. 2017Fine-Grained Car Detection for Visual Census Estimationcited by 76
  18. 2022Revisiting Parameter-Efficient Tuning: Are We Really There Yet?cited by 76
  19. 2021On Transferability of Prompt Tuning for Natural Language Processingcited by 75
  20. 2016DeepMind Labcited by 74
  21. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  22. 2023E^2VPT: An Effective and Efficient Approach for Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 70
  23. 2023Read-only Prompt Optimization for Vision-Language Few-shot Learningcited by 58
  24. 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
  25. 2021How Well Do Sparse Imagenet Models Transfer?cited by 50
  26. 2023On the Role of Attention in Prompt-tuningcited by 50
  27. 2022Teaching Matters: Investigating the Role of Supervision in Vision Transformerscited by 45
  28. 2023When Do Prompting and Prefix-Tuning Work? A Theory of Capabilities and Limitationscited by 43
  29. 2024Revisiting the Power of Prompt for Visual Tuningcited by 32
  30. 2022A Closer Look at Self-Supervised Lightweight Vision Transformerscited by 31
  31. 2023Universality and Limitations of Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  32. 2024Visual Fourier Prompt Tuningcited by 30
  33. 2023Steering Prototypes with Prompt-tuning for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 22
  34. 2024A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classificationcited by 19
  35. 2022Towards Unified Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Text Classificationcited by 18
  36. 2025DA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision Transformerscited by 17
  37. 2024Prompt as Free Lunch: Enhancing Diversity in Source-Free Cross-domain Few-shot Learning through Semantic-Guided Promptingcited by 10
  38. 2023Do We Really Need a Large Number of Visual Prompts?cited by 9

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.