What Questions Should Robots Be Able to Answer? A Dataset of User Questions for Explainable Robotics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing use of large language models and conversational interfaces in human-robot interaction, robots' ability to answer user questions is more important than ever. We therefore introduce a dataset of 1,893 user questions for household robots, collected from 100 participants and organized into 12 categories and 70 subcategories. Most work in explainable robotics focuses on why-questions. In contrast, our dataset provides a wide variety of questions, from questions about simple execution details to questions about how the robot would act in hypothetical scenarios -- thus giving roboticists valuable insights into what questions their robot needs to be able to answer. To collect the dataset, we created 15 video stimuli and 7 text stimuli, depicting robots performing varied household tasks. We then asked participants on Prolific what questions they would want to ask the robot in each portrayed situation. In the final dataset, the most frequent categories are questions about task execution details (21.4%), the robot's capabilities (12.6%), and performance assessments (10.7%). Although questions about how robots would handle potentially difficult scenarios and ensure correct behavior are less frequent, users rank them as the most important for robots to be able to answer. Moreover, we find that users who identify as novices in robotics ask different questions than more experienced users. Novices are more likely to inquire about simple facts, such as what the robot did or the current state of the environment. As robots enter environments shared with humans and language becomes central to giving instructions and interaction, this dataset provides a valuable foundation for (i) identifying the information robots need to log and expose to conversational interfaces, (ii) benchmarking question-answering modules, and (iii) designing explanation strategies that align with user expectations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2025.
Builds on
19 of 71 references.
References · 19
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
- 2021TEACh: Task-driven Embodied Agents that Chatcited by 194
- 2021Learning Language-Conditioned Robot Behavior from Offline Data and Crowd-Sourced Annotationcited by 117
- 2019Analysis of Explainers of Black Box Deep Neural Networks for Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 93
- 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
- 2022DialFRED: Dialogue-Enabled Agents for Embodied Instruction Followingcited by 63
7 more
- 2017Explainable Planningcited by 40
- 2019Towards Explainable AI Planning as a Servicecited by 14
- 2020AIR-Act2Act: Human-human interaction dataset for teaching non-verbal social behaviors to robotscited by 9
- 2024Explaining Autonomy: Enhancing Human-Robot Interaction through Explanation Generation with Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024ERR@HRI 2024 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Interactionscited by 4
- 2024SCOUT: A Situated and Multi-Modal Human-Robot Dialogue Corpuscited by 4
- 2024REACT: Two Datasets for Analyzing Both Human Reactions and Evaluative Feedback to Robots Over Timecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.