mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Intent-Driven Storage Systems: From Low-Level Tuning to High-Level Understanding

arXiv 2510.15917 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.AR cs.AI cs.DCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing storage systems lack visibility into workload intent, limiting their ability to adapt to the semantics of modern, large-scale data-intensive applications. This disconnect leads to brittle heuristics and fragmented, siloed optimizations. To address these limitations, we propose Intent-Driven Storage Systems (IDSS), a vision for a new paradigm where large language models (LLMs) infer workload and system intent from unstructured signals to guide adaptive and cross-layer parameter reconfiguration. IDSS provides holistic reasoning for competing demands, synthesizing safe and efficient decisions within policy guardrails. We present four design principles for integrating LLMs into storage control loops and propose a corresponding system architecture. Initial results on FileBench workloads show that IDSS can improve IOPS by up to 2.45X by interpreting intent and generating actionable configurations for storage components such as caching and prefetching. These findings suggest that, when constrained by guardrails and embedded within structured workflows, LLMs can function as high-level semantic optimizers, bridging the gap between application goals and low-level system control. IDSS points toward a future in which storage systems are increasingly adaptive, autonomous, and aligned with dynamic workload demands.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 66 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2020Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 504
  4. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
  5. 2022What Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?cited by 149
  6. 2024LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigationcited by 92
  7. 2024NetLLM: Adapting Large Language Models for Networkingcited by 76
  8. 2024PlanRAG: A Plan-then-Retrieval Augmented Generation for Generative Large Language Models as Decision Makerscited by 42
  9. 2022Sub-Task Decomposition Enables Learning in Sequence to Sequence Taskscited by 41
  10. 2024LLMParser: An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Log Parsingcited by 32
  11. 2024KnowHalu: Hallucination Detection via Multi-Form Knowledge Based Factual Checkingcited by 26
  12. 2024De-Hallucinator: Mitigating LLM Hallucinations in Code Generation Tasks via Iterative Groundingcited by 14
3 more
  1. 2024LLM-based policy generation for intent-based management of applicationscited by 13
  2. 2020A Study of Checkpointing in Large Scale Training of Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  3. 2024Adapting Large Language Models to Log Analysis with Interpretable Domain Knowledgecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.