mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neuro-Symbolic Spatial Reasoning in Segmentation

arXiv 2510.15841 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation (OVSS) assigns pixel-level labels from an open set of categories, requiring generalization to unseen and unlabelled objects. Using vision-language models (VLMs) to correlate local image patches with potential unseen object categories suffers from a lack of understanding of spatial relations of objects in a scene. To solve this problem, we introduce neuro-symbolic (NeSy) spatial reasoning in OVSS. In contrast to contemporary VLM correlation-based approaches, we propose Relational Segmentor (RelateSeg) to impose explicit spatial relational constraints by first order logic (FOL) formulated in a neural network architecture. This is the first attempt to explore NeSy spatial reasoning in OVSS. Specifically, RelateSeg automatically extracts spatial relations, e.g., <cat, to-right-of, person>, and encodes them as first-order logic formulas using our proposed pseudo categories. Each pixel learns to predict both a semantic category (e.g., "cat") and a spatial pseudo category (e.g., "right of person") simultaneously, enforcing relational constraints (e.g., a "cat" pixel must lie to the right of a "person"). Finally, these logic constraints are formulated in a deep network architecture by fuzzy logic relaxation, enabling end-to-end learning of spatial-relationally consistent segmentation. RelateSeg achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of average mIoU across four benchmark datasets and particularly shows clear advantages on images containing multiple categories, with the cost of only introducing a single auxiliary loss function and no additional parameters, validating the effectiveness of NeSy spatial reasoning in OVSS.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

6 of 53 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  2. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  3. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 214
  4. 2023Diffuse, Attend, and Segment: Unsupervised Zero-Shot Segmentation using Stable Diffusioncited by 131
  5. 2023The All-Seeing Project: Towards Panoptic Visual Recognition and Understanding of the Open Worldcited by 114
  6. 2023Diffusion Models for Open-Vocabulary Segmentationcited by 63

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Referring Expressions as a Lens into Spatial Language Grounding in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2025OpenSeg-R: Improving Open-Vocabulary Segmentation via Step-by-Step Visual Reasoning
  3. 2024Structured Spatial Reasoning with Open Vocabulary Object Detectors
  4. 2023LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning
  5. 2025Exploring Spatial Language Grounding Through Referring Expressions
  6. 2024GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs
  7. 2024RelationVLM: Making Large Vision-Language Models Understand Visual Relations
  8. 2023Towards Grounded Visual Spatial Reasoning in Multi-Modal Vision Language Models