Learning to Undo: Rollback-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Reversibility Signals
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proposes a reversible learning framework to improve the robustness and efficiency of value based Reinforcement Learning agents, addressing vulnerability to value overestimation and instability in partially irreversible environments. The framework has two complementary core mechanisms: an empirically derived transition reversibility measure called Phi of s and a, and a selective state rollback operation. We introduce an online per state action estimator called Phi that quantifies the likelihood of returning to a prior state within a fixed horizon K. This measure is used to adjust the penalty term during temporal difference updates dynamically, integrating reversibility awareness directly into the value function. The system also includes a selective rollback operator. When an action yields an expected return markedly lower than its instantaneous estimated value and violates a predefined threshold, the agent is penalized and returns to the preceding state rather than progressing. This interrupts sub optimal high risk trajectories and avoids catastrophic steps. By combining reversibility aware evaluation with targeted rollback, the method improves safety, performance, and stability. In the CliffWalking v0 domain, the framework reduced catastrophic falls by over 99.8 percent and yielded a 55 percent increase in mean episode return. In the Taxi v3 domain, it suppressed illegal actions by greater than or equal to 99.9 percent and achieved a 65.7 percent improvement in cumulative reward, while also sharply reducing reward variance in both environments. Ablation studies confirm that the rollback mechanism is the critical component underlying these safety and performance gains, marking a robust step toward safe and reliable sequential decision making.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.
Builds on
19 of 28 references.
References · 19
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
- 2016Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNcited by 518
- 2020PettingZoo: Gym for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 209
- 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
- 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
- 2016Q(λ) with Off-Policy Correctionscited by 48
- 2023State-wise Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 48
7 more
- 2024A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
- 2023Safe Exploration in Reinforcement Learning: A Generalized Formulation and Algorithmscited by 27
- 2024ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
- 2024Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Perspective of Gradient Manipulationcited by 21
- 2021There Is No Turning Back: A Self-Supervised Approach for Reversibility-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
- 2025A Survey of Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constrained MDPs: A Technical Survey on Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Safetycited by 12
- 2024Learning Control Barrier Functions and their application in Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.