mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

REVERSAL-BENCH: A Reversibility Axis and Reset Oracle for Measuring the Reset-Free RL Cliff

arXiv 2609.17745 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Deep RL algorithms and representations

Abstract (arXiv)

A central goal of autonomous reinforcement learning is continuous policy training without external resets. However, existing paradigms largely depend on underlying environmental reversibility, a property absent in real world manipulation, where events such as pushing objects off tables or spilling granular substances cannot be undone. We introduce REVERSAL-BENCH, a benchmark that controls reversibility via a continuous parameter ρ ∈ [0, 1] and provides a reset oracle, a ground-truth verification mechanism to test state recoverability across eight manipulation settings in five physics engines. Evaluating a broad spectrum of policy architectures, including standard actor-critic algorithms, safe RL, and specialized reset-free frameworks, reveals a sharp reversibility cliff: reset-free agents are consistently absorbed into irrecoverable states as ρ increases, whereas episodic agents maintain steady learning. We see this failure mode across autonomous reset-free baselines and constrained RL. Because reset-free agents lack external resets, any transition into an irrecoverable state results in permanent absorption, leaving the agent trapped where further learning halts. We show that this absorption phenomenon persists in full physics simulations under learned manipulation policies. By evaluating against geometrically identical reversible counterparts, we confirm that this breakdown is causally driven by irreversibility rather than obstacle complexity. We release the benchmark suite, a large multi-simulator dataset labeled with recoverability and a reset oracle. We also evaluate a safety shield that intervenes before irreversible failures occur, showing that while recoverability can be predicted accurately, active recovery primarily succeeds only when the agent can physically steer clear of the trap

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Deep RL algorithms and representations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 13 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.

Builds on

13 of 14 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Learning to Undo: Rollback-Augmented Reinforcement Learning with Reversibility Signals16 Oct
  2. 2024Reset-free Reinforcement Learning with World Models19 Aug

Other references · 11

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  2. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  3. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 316
  4. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 175
  5. 2020The Ingredients of Real-World Robotic Reinforcement Learningcited by 117
  6. 2017Leave no Trace: Learning to Reset for Safe and Autonomous Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  7. 2021Autonomous Reinforcement Learning via Subgoal Curriculacited by 33
  8. 2021Autonomous Reinforcement Learning: Formalism and Benchmarkingcited by 33
  9. 2022A State-Distribution Matching Approach to Non-Episodic Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  10. 2021There Is No Turning Back: A Self-Supervised Approach for Reversibility-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 18
  11. 2024Intelligent Switching for Reset-Free RLcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RTPO: Reverse-Turn Policy Optimization for Stabilizing Agentic RL Training
  2. 2026Stability-Aligned Residual Adaptation for Rapid Recovery from Dynamics Shifts ↗
  3. 2024The Power of Resets in Online Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Reversible Simplex Supervision with Post-Action Debt Accounting for Goal-Reaching RL
  5. 2021OPIRL: Sample Efficient Off-Policy Inverse Reinforcement Learning via Distribution Matching
  6. 2024Contractive Dynamical Imitation Policies for Efficient Out-of-Sample Recovery
  7. 2024Reset & Distill: A Recipe for Overcoming Negative Transfer in Continual Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Interactionless Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Data-Centric Framework for Durable Alignment