mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DPRF: A Generalizable Dynamic Persona Refinement Framework for Optimizing Behavior Alignment Between Personalized LLM Role-Playing Agents and Humans

arXiv 2510.14205 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate

Abstract (arXiv)

The emerging large language model role-playing agents (LLM RPAs) aim to simulate individual human behaviors, but the persona fidelity is often undermined by manually-created profiles (e.g., cherry-picked information and personality characteristics) without validating the alignment with the target individuals. To address this limitation, our work introduces the Dynamic Persona Refinement Framework (DPRF). DPRF aims to optimize the alignment of LLM RPAs' behaviors with those of target individuals by iteratively identifying the cognitive divergence, either through free-form or theory-grounded, structured analysis, between generated behaviors and human ground truth, and refining the persona profile to mitigate these divergences. We evaluate DPRF with five LLMs on four diverse behavior-prediction scenarios: formal debates, social media posts with mental health issues, public interviews, and movie reviews. DPRF can consistently improve behavioral alignment considerably over baseline personas and generalizes across models and scenarios. Our work provides a robust methodology for creating high-fidelity persona profiles and enhancing the validity of downstream applications, such as user simulation, social studies, and personalized AI.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2025.

Builds on

30 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Towards a Design Guideline for RPA Evaluation: A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Role-Playing Agents18 Feb
  2. 2024LLM Agents Grounded in Self-Reports Enable General-Purpose Simulation of Individuals15 Nov
  3. 2024AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation5 Mar
  4. 2023War and Peace (WarAgent): Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Simulation of World Wars28 Nov
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior7 Apr

Other references · 25

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  5. 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 820
  6. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  7. 2022Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing Systemscited by 300
  8. 2023PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traitscited by 229
  9. 2016A Persona-Based Neural Conversation Modelcited by 221
  10. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Taskscited by 217
  11. 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 203
  12. 2024Large language models that replace human participants can harmfully misportray and flatten identity groupscited by 137
13 more
  1. 2023Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debatecited by 92
  2. 2023Can Large Language Models Serve as Rational Players in Game Theory? A Systematic Analysiscited by 91
  3. 2024Rethinking LLM Memorization through the Lens of Adversarial Compressioncited by 91
  4. 2024The Oscars of AI Theater: A Survey on Role-Playing with Language Modelscited by 47
  5. 2024Y Social: an LLM-powered Social Media Digital Twincited by 43
  6. 2024From Role-Play to Drama-Interaction: An LLM Solutioncited by 42
  7. 2025LLM-based Human Simulations Have Not Yet Been Reliablecited by 30
  8. 2025Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluationcited by 26
  9. 2016Conversational flow in Oxford-style debatescited by 25
  10. 2023An Empathy-Based Sandbox Approach to Bridge the Privacy Gap among Attitudes, Goals, Knowledge, and Behaviorscited by 18
  11. 2024Privacy Leakage Overshadowed by Views of AI: A Study on Human Oversight of Privacy in Language Model Agentcited by 14
  12. 2025UXAgent: A System for Simulating Usability Testing of Web Design with LLM Agentscited by 10
  13. 2025Simulation as Reality? The Effectiveness of LLM-Generated Data in Open-ended Question Assessmentcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024CharacterGPT: A Persona Reconstruction Framework for Role-Playing Agents
  2. 2026Deep Persona: A Psychologically Grounded Architecture and Evaluation Framework for Role-Playing Agents and Simulations
  3. 2026Beyond Cooperative Simulators: Generating Realistic User Personas for Robust Evaluation of LLM Agents
  4. 2026Enhancing Persona Following at Decoding Time via Dynamic Importance Estimation for Role-Playing Agents
  5. 2024PersonaGym: Evaluating Persona Agents and LLMs
  6. 2026Facet-Level Persona Control by Trait-Activated Routing with Contrastive SAE for Role-Playing LLMs
  7. 2025Enhancing Persona Consistency for LLMs' Role-Playing using Persona-Aware Contrastive Learning
  8. 2026Rethinking Role-Playing Evaluation: Anonymous Benchmarking and a Systematic Study of Personality Effects