MindBenchAI: An Actionable Platform to Evaluate the Profile and Performance of Large Language Models in a Mental Healthcare Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Individuals are increasingly utilizing large language model (LLM)based tools for mental health guidance and crisis support in place of human experts. While AI technology has great potential to improve health outcomes, insufficient empirical evidence exists to suggest that AI technology can be deployed as a clinical replacement; thus, there is an urgent need to assess and regulate such tools. Regulatory efforts have been made and multiple evaluation frameworks have been proposed, however,field-wide assessment metrics have yet to be formally integrated. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive online platform that aggregates evaluation approaches and serves as a dynamic online resource to simplify LLM and LLM-based tool assessment: MindBenchAI. At its core, MindBenchAI is designed to provide easily accessible/interpretable information for diverse stakeholders (patients, clinicians, developers, regulators, etc.). To create MindBenchAI, we built off our work developing MINDapps.org to support informed decision-making around smartphone app use for mental health, and expanded the technical MINDapps.org framework to encompass novel large language model (LLM) functionalities through benchmarking approaches. The MindBenchAI platform is designed as a partnership with the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) to provide assessment tools that systematically evaluate LLMs and LLM-based tools with objective and transparent criteria from a healthcare standpoint, assessing both profile (i.e. technical features, privacy protections, and conversational style) and performance characteristics (i.e. clinical reasoning skills).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemmacited by 0
- 2026FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessmentcited by 0
- 2026Cloze: An Open Research Platform for Studying Human-AI Conversations in Mental Health Contextscited by 0
- 2026DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbotscited by 0
- 2026Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinical Safety and Environmental Impact in Therapeutic LLMscited by 0
- 2026Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinical Safety and Environmental Impact in Therapeutic LLMs12 Aug 2026
- 2026DelusionEval: Measuring Delusion-Linked Behaviors in AI Chatbots5 Aug 2026
- 2026Cloze: An Open Research Platform for Studying Human-AI Conversations in Mental Health Contexts13 Jun 2026
- 2026FAIR_XAI: Improving Multimodal Foundation Model Fairness via Explainability for Wellbeing Assessment26 Apr 2026
- 2026Real-World AI Evaluation: How FRAME Generates Systematic Evidence to Resolve the Decision-Maker's Dilemma28 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Assessing Risks of Large Language Models in Mental Health Support: A Framework for Automated Clinical AI Red Teaming
- 2025MindEval: Benchmarking Language Models on Multi-turn Mental Health Support
- 2024Building Trust in Mental Health Chatbots: Safety Metrics and LLM-Based Evaluation Tools
- 2023Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Using Large Language Model-based Conversational Agents for Mental Well-being Support
- 2025Mentalic Net: Development of RAG-based Conversational AI and Evaluation Framework for Mental Health Support
- 2024Do Large Language Models Align with Core Mental Health Counseling Competencies?
- 2025PsychBench: A comprehensive and professional benchmark for evaluating the performance of LLM-assisted psychiatric clinical practice
- 2023Rethinking Large Language Models in Mental Health Applications