Confidence-Based Response Abstinence: Improving LLM Trustworthiness via Activation-Based Uncertainty Estimation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a method for confidence estimation in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that aligns closely with the correctness of large language model (LLM) outputs. Confidence estimation is especially critical in high-stakes domains such as finance and healthcare, where the cost of an incorrect answer outweighs that of not answering the question. Our approach extends prior uncertainty quantification methods by leveraging raw feed-forward network (FFN) activations as auto-regressive signals, avoiding the information loss inherent in token logits and probabilities after projection and softmax normalization. We model confidence prediction as a sequence classification task, and regularize training with a Huber loss term to improve robustness against noisy supervision. Applied in a real-world financial industry customer-support setting with complex knowledge bases, our method outperforms strong baselines and maintains high accuracy under strict latency constraints. Experiments on Llama 3.1 8B model show that using activations from only the 16th layer preserves accuracy while reducing response latency. Our results demonstrate that activation-based confidence modeling offers a scalable, architecture-aware path toward trustworthy RAG deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 10 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.
Builds on
10 of 17 references.
References · 10
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 812
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2024Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approachcited by 76
- 2024MARS: Meaning-Aware Response Scoring for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMscited by 46
- 2023Llamas Know What GPTs Don't Show: Surrogate Models for Confidence Estimationcited by 39
- 2024Enhancing Confidence Expression in Large Language Models Through Learning from Past Experiencecited by 21
- 2022Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Explicit Regularisation and Dynamic Data Pruningcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Query-Level Uncertainty in Large Language Models
- 2025After Retrieval, Before Generation: Enhancing the Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs
- 2026URAG: A Benchmark for Uncertainty Quantification in Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
- 2024Understanding the Impact of Confidence in Retrieval Augmented Generation: A Case Study in the Medical Domain
- 2024Confidence Under the Hood: An Investigation into the Confidence-Probability Alignment in Large Language Models
- 2026LLM-Confidence Reranker: A Training-Free Approach for Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
- 2026Know When You're Wrong: Aligning Confidence with Correctness for LLM Error Detection