Generalist++: A Meta-learning Framework for Mitigating Trade-off in Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the rapid progress of neural networks, they remain highly vulnerable to adversarial examples, for which adversarial training (AT) is currently the most effective defense. While AT has been extensively studied, its practical applications expose two major limitations: natural accuracy tends to degrade significantly compared with standard training, and robustness does not transfer well across attacks crafted under different norm constraints. Unlike prior works that attempt to address only one issue within a single network, we propose to partition the overall generalization goal into multiple sub-tasks, each assigned to a dedicated base learner. By specializing in its designated objective, each base learner quickly becomes an expert in its field. In the later stages of training, we interpolate their parameters to form a knowledgeable global learner, while periodically redistributing the global parameters back to the base learners to prevent their optimization trajectories from drifting too far from the shared target. We term this framework Generalist and introduce three variants tailored to different application scenarios. Both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate that Generalist achieves lower generalization error and significantly alleviates the trade-off problems compared with baseline methods. Our results suggest that Generalist provides a promising step toward developing fully robust classifiers in the future.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.
Builds on
44 of 67 references.
References · 44
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
32 more
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
- 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,209
- 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 436
- 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
- 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 316
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 204
- 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
- 2019Are Labels Required for Improving Adversarial Robustness?cited by 163
- 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 130
- 2022Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definitioncited by 111
- 2016Fully-adaptive Feature Sharing in Multi-Task Networks with Applications in Person Attribute Classificationcited by 93
- 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
- 2016Deep Multi-task Representation Learning: A Tensor Factorisation Approachcited by 69
- 2022When Adversarial Training Meets Vision Transformers: Recipes from Training to Architecturecited by 64
- 2019Robustness to Adversarial Perturbations in Learning from Incomplete Datacited by 49
- 2019Interpolated Adversarial Training: Achieving Robust Neural Networks without Sacrificing Too Much Accuracycited by 49
- 2022Self-Ensemble Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 38
- 2016Integrated perception with recurrent multi-task neural networkscited by 24
- 2021Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single lp-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust Classifierscited by 23
- 2020Learning to Generate Noise for Multi-Attack Robustnesscited by 17
- 2024RAT: Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Agents for Targeted Behaviorscited by 16
- 2023Generalist: Decoupling Natural and Robust Generalizationcited by 14
- 2024Conserve-Update-Revise to Cure Generalization and Robustness Trade-off in Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
- 2024Improving Accuracy-robustness Trade-off via Pixel Reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 6
- 2024On the Adversarial Transferability of Generalized "Skip Connections"cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.