SVAG-Bench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Multi-Instance Spatio-temporal Video Action Grounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A truly capable AI system must do more than detect objects or recognize activities in isolation. It must form unified, grounded representations of who is acting, what they are doing, and when and where these actions unfold. These representations provide the perceptual bedrock for high-level reasoning, planning, and embodied interaction in the real world. Building such agents is central to long-horizon goals in embodied AI and robotics. Current video benchmarks evaluate fragments of these capabilities in isolation. They focus on either spatial grounding, object tracking, or temporal localization. As a result, they cannot rigorously measure progress on their joint, multi-instance integration. We introduce Spatio-temporal Video Action Grounding (SVAG), a task and benchmark that explicitly targets this unified competence by requiring models to simultaneously detect, track, and temporally localize all objects that satisfy a natural language query in complex, multi-actor scenes. To support this task, we construct SVAG-Bench. It comprises 688 videos, 19,590 verified annotations, and 903 unique action verbs drawn from crowded urban environments, wildlife, and traffic surveillance. Each video has on average 28.5 action-centric queries. This yields the densest annotation among comparable video grounding benchmarks and enables fine-grained evaluation of multi-actor disambiguation, temporal overlap, and action compositionality. Annotations are produced by a pipeline that combines expert manual labeling, GPT-3.5 paraphrase augmentation, and human verification to ensure both linguistic diversity and correctness. We further release SVAGEval, a standardized multi-referent evaluation toolkit. We also introduce SVAGFormer, a strong modular baseline architecture for SVAG.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.
Builds on
44 of 56 references.
References · 44
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2025InternVL3.5: Advancing Open-Source Multimodal Models in Versatility, Reasoning, and Efficiencycited by 1,419
- 2017TALL: Temporal Activity Localization via Language Querycited by 581
- 2020HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-Object Trackingcited by 546
- 2025GLM-4.5V and GLM-4.1V-Thinking: Towards Versatile Multimodal Reasoning with Scalable Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
- 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 424
- 2020MOT20: A benchmark for multi object tracking in crowded scenescited by 355
- 2024InternVideo2: Scaling Foundation Models for Multimodal Video Understandingcited by 310
- 2023VTimeLLM: Empower LLM to Grasp Video Momentscited by 253
- 2016Modeling Context Between Objects for Referring Expression Understandingcited by 250
- 2023UniVTG: Towards Unified Video-Language Temporal Groundingcited by 189
- 2018Video Object Segmentation with Language Referring Expressionscited by 161
32 more
- 2021Occluded Video Instance Segmentation: A Benchmarkcited by 154
- 2025Sa2VA: Marrying SAM2 with MLLM for Dense Grounded Understanding of Images and Videoscited by 154
- 2019TVQA+: Spatio-Temporal Grounding for Video Question Answeringcited by 153
- 2020TAO: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tracking Any Objectcited by 146
- 2020MOTChallenge: A Benchmark for Single-Camera Multiple Target Trackingcited by 134
- 2020Where Does It Exist: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding for Multi-Form Sentencescited by 116
- 2024One Token to Seg Them All: Language Instructed Reasoning Segmentation in Videoscited by 99
- 2024TimeSuite: Improving MLLMs for Long Video Understanding via Grounded Tuningcited by 99
- 2023Referring Multi-Object Trackingcited by 91
- 2020Human-centric Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding With Visual Transformerscited by 83
- 2024ChatVTG: Video Temporal Grounding via Chat with Video Dialogue Large Language Modelscited by 54
- 2021End-to-end Multi-modal Video Temporal Groundingcited by 47
- 2023End-to-End Temporal Action Detection with 1B Parameters Across 1000 Framescited by 47
- 2023DVIS++: Improved Decoupled Framework for Universal Video Segmentationcited by 46
- 2024Context-Guided Spatio-Temporal Video Groundingcited by 45
- 2024R2-Tuning: Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learning for Video Temporal Groundingcited by 34
- 2024Prior Knowledge Integration via LLM Encoding and Pseudo Event Regulation for Video Moment Retrievalcited by 30
- 2025SpaceVLLM: Endowing Multimodal Large Language Model with Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding Capabilitycited by 28
- 2023Type-to-Track: Retrieve Any Object via Prompt-based Trackingcited by 24
- 2024FlashVTG: Feature Layering and Adaptive Score Handling Network for Video Temporal Groundingcited by 23
- 2024Bootstrapping Referring Multi-Object Trackingcited by 21
- 2020Visual Relation Grounding in Videoscited by 19
- 2024ReVisionLLM: Recursive Vision-Language Model for Temporal Grounding in Hour-Long Videoscited by 18
- 2023RGNet: A Unified Clip Retrieval and Grounding Network for Long Videoscited by 15
- 2022InstanceFormer: An Online Video Instance Segmentation Frameworkcited by 13
- 2023Temporal Action Localization with Enhanced Instant Discriminabilitycited by 13
- 2025Fine-grained Spatiotemporal Grounding on Egocentric Videoscited by 11
- 2023GRAtt-VIS: Gated Residual Attention for Auto Rectifying Video Instance Segmentationcited by 9
- 2025LD-DETR: Loop Decoder DEtection TRansformer for Video Moment Retrieval and Highlight Detectioncited by 8
- 2022Box Supervised Video Segmentation Proposal Networkcited by 4
- 2022STVGFormer: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding with Static-Dynamic Cross-Modal Understandingcited by 3
- 2024Enhancing Temporal Action Localization: Advanced S6 Modeling with Recurrent Mechanismcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.