Tailored untruths: How personalisation challenges LLM safeguards
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate highly persuasive disinformation, yet little is known about how effectively they personalise it across languages and demographic groups. We present the first large-scale multilingual study of persona-targeted disinformation generation by LLMs. Using a red-teaming methodology, we prompted eight leading models with 324 false narratives and 150 demographic personas in four languages (English, Russian, Portuguese, and Hindi), creating AI-TRAITS, a dataset of 1.6 million personalised disinformation texts. We treat safeguards as compromised whenever a model generates the requested falsehood, whether directly or accompanied by a safety disclaimer. Across models, safeguards failed for 80% of non-personalised prompts and 77.7% of personalised ones, with Grok producing disinformation in over 94% of cases. All models effectively tailored outputs to target personas, employing substantially more persuasive techniques than in non-personalised content. Additional analyses reveal persona-specific linguistic and psychological patterns and show that safeguard effectiveness varies markedly across languages. Together, these findings expose significant weaknesses in current LLM safety mechanisms and highlight the need for more robust, multilingual safeguards against personalised AI-generated disinformation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 55 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.
Builds on
55 of 83 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Safeguarding Large Language Models: A Survey3 Jun
- 2024SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety8 Apr
Other references · 53
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2019Defending Against Neural Fake Newscited by 559
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
- 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 385
- 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
- 2023Multilingual Jailbreak Challenges in Large Language Modelscited by 240
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 212
38 more
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 208
- 2020CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claimscited by 196
- 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 177
- 2024Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulationscited by 169
- 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 148
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2023Explore, Establish, Exploit: Red Teaming Language Models from Scratchcited by 114
- 2024Modular Pluralism: Pluralistic Alignment via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 113
- 2023The Earth is Flat because...: Investigating LLMs' Belief towards Misinformation via Persuasive Conversationcited by 109
- 2024Personalization of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 104
- 2025LLM Social Simulations Are a Promising Research Methodcited by 99
- 2023Combating Misinformation in the Age of LLMs: Opportunities and Challengescited by 95
- 2023AI model GPT-3 (dis)informs us better than humanscited by 78
- 2025A Survey of Personalized Large Language Models: Progress and Future Directionscited by 71
- 2025Specializing Large Language Models to Simulate Survey Response Distributions for Global Populationscited by 53
- 2023Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformationcited by 51
- 2024CultureLLM: Incorporating Cultural Differences into Large Language Modelscited by 50
- 2020Where Are the Facts? Searching for Fact-checked Information to Alleviate the Spread of Fake Newscited by 48
- 2022Synthetic Disinformation Attacks on Automated Fact Verification Systemscited by 44
- 2024RedAgent: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Context-aware Autonomous Language Agentcited by 44
- 2024A Cross-Language Investigation into Jailbreak Attacks in Large Language Modelscited by 41
- 2023Machine-Made Media: Monitoring the Mobilization of Machine-Generated Articles on Misinformation and Mainstream News Websitescited by 38
- 2024Measuring and Benchmarking Large Language Models' Capabilities to Generate Persuasive Languagecited by 31
- 2021Call for Customized Conversation: Customized Conversation Grounding Persona and Knowledgecited by 30
- 2023RECAP: Retrieval-Enhanced Context-Aware Prefix Encoder for Personalized Dialogue Response Generationcited by 25
- 2023Disinformation Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2024Cultural Commonsense Knowledge for Intercultural Dialoguescited by 20
- 2024Evaluation of LLM Vulnerabilities to Being Misused for Personalized Disinformation Generationcited by 20
- 2025The Levers of Political Persuasion with Conversational AIcited by 20
- 2023Fake News Detectors are Biased against Texts Generated by Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2023FakeGPT: Fake News Generation, Explanation and Detection of Large Language Modelscited by 17
- 2023VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy towards COVID-19 Vaccination on Twittercited by 14
- 2023Weakly Supervised Veracity Classification with LLM-Predicted Credibility Signalscited by 14
- 2024EUvsDisinfo: A Dataset for Multilingual Detection of Pro-Kremlin Disinformation in News Articlescited by 10
- 2023Med-MMHL: A Multi-Modal Dataset for Detecting Human- and LLM-Generated Misinformation in the Medical Domaincited by 9
- 2023Automated Evaluation of Personalized Text Generation using Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2023P5: Plug-and-Play Persona Prompting for Personalized Response Selectioncited by 8
- 2024MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts"cited by 6
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026To Lie or Not to Lie? Investigating The Biased Spread of Global Lies by LLMs
- 2025LLMs are Vulnerable to Malicious Prompts Disguised as Scientific Language
- 2025Whose Personae? Synthetic Persona Experiments in LLM Research and Pathways to Transparency
- 2026Persona Prompting as a Lens on LLM Social Reasoning
- 2024Learn and Unlearn: Addressing Misinformation in Multilingual LLMs
- 2024A Synthetic Dataset for Personal Attribute Inference
- 2025What Should LLMs Forget? Quantifying Personal Data in LLMs for Right-to-Be-Forgotten Requests
- 2024A Survey on the Honesty of Large Language Models