Uncertainty-Aware, Risk-Adaptive Access Control for Agentic Systems using an LLM-Judged TBAC Model
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
The proliferation of autonomous AI agents within enterprise environments introduces a critical security challenge: managing access control for emergent, novel tasks for which no predefined policies exist. This paper introduces an advanced security framework that extends the Task-Based Access Control (TBAC) model by using a Large Language Model (LLM) as an autonomous, risk-aware judge. This model makes access control decisions not only based on an agent's intent but also by explicitly considering the inherent risk associated with target resources and the LLM's own model uncertainty in its decision-making process. When an agent proposes a novel task, the LLM judge synthesizes a just-in-time policy while also computing a composite risk score for the task and an uncertainty estimate for its own reasoning. High-risk or high-uncertainty requests trigger more stringent controls, such as requiring human approval. This dual consideration of external risk and internal confidence allows the model to enforce a more robust and adaptive version of the principle of least privilege, paving the way for safer and more trustworthy autonomous systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
2 of 10 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025SoK: Trust-Authorization Mismatch in LLM Agent Interactionscited by 11
- 2026ROPE: Routed Origin Policy Enforcement against Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 2
- 2026Towards an Agent Operating System - Lessons from Classical and Cloud OScited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Studycited by 0
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study7 Sep 2026
- 2026ROPE: Routed Origin Policy Enforcement against Indirect Prompt Injection27 Aug 2026
- 2026Towards an Agent Operating System - Lessons from Classical and Cloud OS27 Jul 2026
- 2025SoK: Trust-Authorization Mismatch in LLM Agent Interactions7 Dec 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hybrid Inspection and Task-Based Access Control in Zero-Trust Agentic AI
- 2025A Vision for Access Control in LLM-based Agent Systems
- 2025A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents
- 2026ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents
- 2026SafeAgent: A Runtime Protection Architecture for Agentic Systems
- 2026Architecting Secure AI Agents: Perspectives on System-Level Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks
- 2026Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security
- 2025A Safety and Security Framework for Real-World Agentic Systems