mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Autonomous vehicles need social awareness to find optima in multi-agent reinforcement learning routing games

arXiv 2510.11410 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → Cooperative and V2X driving

Abstract (arXiv)

Previous work has shown that when multiple selfish Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) are introduced to future cities and start learning optimal routing strategies using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), they may destabilize traffic systems, as they would require a significant amount of time to converge to the optimal solution, equivalent to years of real-world commuting. We demonstrate that moving beyond the selfish component in the reward significantly relieves this issue. If each AV, apart from minimizing its own travel time, aims to reduce its impact on the system, this will be beneficial not only for the system-wide performance but also for each individual player in this routing game. By introducing an intrinsic reward signal based on the marginal cost matrix, we significantly reduce training time and achieve convergence more reliably. Marginal cost quantifies the impact of each individual action (route-choice) on the system (total travel time). Including it as one of the components of the reward can reduce the degree of non-stationarity by aligning agents' objectives. Notably, the proposed counterfactual formulation preserves the system's equilibria and avoids oscillations. Our experiments show that training MARL algorithms with our novel reward formulation enables the agents to converge to the optimal solution, whereas the baseline algorithms fail to do so. We show these effects in both a toy network and the real-world network of Saint-Arnoult. Our results optimistically indicate that social awareness (i.e., including marginal costs in routing decisions) improves both the system-wide and individual performance of future urban systems with AVs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Cooperative and V2X driving, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 5 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

5 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025URB -- Urban Routing Benchmark for RL-equipped Connected Autonomous Vehicles23 May
  2. 2025Collaboration Between the City and Machine Learning Community is Crucial to Efficient Autonomous Vehicles Routing18 Feb

Other references · 3

  1. 2019Learning How to Dynamically Route Autonomous Vehicles on Shared Roadscited by 13
  2. 2025RouteRL: Multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for urban route choice with autonomous vehiclescited by 3
  3. 2025Wardropian Cycles make traffic assignment both optimal and fair by eliminating price-of-anarchy with Cyclical User Equilibrium for compliant connected autonomous vehiclescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Impact of Collective Behaviors of Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Traffic Dynamics: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach
  2. 2025Self-Interest and Systemic Benefits: Emergence of Collective Rationality in Mixed Autonomy Traffic Through Deep Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2022Learning-based social coordination to improve safety and robustness of cooperative autonomous vehicles in mixed traffic
  4. 2022Robustness and Adaptability of Reinforcement Learning based Cooperative Autonomous Driving in Mixed-autonomy Traffic
  5. 2021Altruistic Maneuver Planning for Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles Using Multi-agent Advantage Actor-Critic
  6. 2024Multi-Agent Environments for Vehicle Routing Problems
  7. 2021Social Coordination and Altruism in Autonomous Driving
  8. 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Comprehensive Survey