mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Self-Interest and Systemic Benefits: Emergence of Collective Rationality in Mixed Autonomy Traffic Through Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2511.04883 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are expected to be commercially available in the near future, leading to mixed autonomy traffic consisting of both AVs and human-driven vehicles (HVs). Although numerous studies have shown that AVs can be deployed to benefit the overall traffic system performance by incorporating system-level goals into their decision making, it is not clear whether the benefits still exist when agents act out of self-interest -- a trait common to all driving agents, both human and autonomous. This study aims to understand whether self-interested AVs can bring benefits to all driving agents in mixed autonomy traffic systems. The research is centered on the concept of collective rationality (CR). This concept, originating from game theory and behavioral economics, means that driving agents may cooperate collectively even when pursuing individual interests. Our recent research has proven the existence of CR in an analytical game-theoretical model and empirically in mixed human-driven traffic. In this paper, we demonstrate that CR can be attained among driving agents trained using deep reinforcement learning (DRL) with a simple reward design. We examine the extent to which self-interested traffic agents can achieve CR without directly incorporating system-level objectives. Results show that CR consistently emerges in various scenarios, which indicates the robustness of this property. We also postulate a mechanism to explain the emergence of CR in the microscopic and dynamic environment and verify it based on simulation evidence. This research suggests the possibility of leveraging advanced learning methods (such as federated learning) to achieve collective cooperation among self-interested driving agents in mixed-autonomy systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 56 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Human-Like Autonomous Car-Following Model with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 47
  2. 2022Conditional Predictive Behavior Planning with Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human-like Autonomous Drivingcited by 34
  3. 2020Human-Like Decision Making for Autonomous Driving: A Noncooperative Game Theoretic Approachcited by 30
  4. 2019Are commercially implemented adaptive cruise control systems string stable?cited by 12
  5. 2020Learning from Naturalistic Driving Data for Human-like Autonomous Highway Drivingcited by 12
  6. 2019A Game-Theoretic Framework for Autonomous Vehicles Velocity Control: Bridging Microscopic Differential Games and Macroscopic Mean Field Gamescited by 9
  7. 2020Influence of CAV Clustering Strategies on Mixed Traffic Flow Characteristics: An Analysis of Vehicle Trajectory Datacited by 5
  8. 2019Model based string stability of adaptive cruise control systems using field datacited by 4
  9. 2021Optimization-Based Path-Planning for Connected and non-Connected Automated Vehiclescited by 4
  10. 2016Optimal Control for Speed Harmonization of Automated Vehiclescited by 3
  11. 2020Trajectory Planning for Connected and Automated Vehicles: Cruising, Lane Changing, and Platooningcited by 2
  12. 2024Evidence and quantification of cooperation of driving agents in mixed traffic flowcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.