mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reliable Cross-modal Alignment via Prototype Iterative Construction

arXiv 2510.11175 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-modal alignment is an important multi-modal task, aiming to bridge the semantic gap between different modalities. The most reliable fundamention for achieving this objective lies in the semantic consistency between matched pairs. Conventional methods implicitly assume embeddings contain solely semantic information, ignoring the impact of non-semantic information during alignment, which inevitably leads to information bias or even loss. These non-semantic information primarily manifest as stylistic variations in the data, which we formally define as style information. An intuitive approach is to separate style from semantics, aligning only the semantic information. However, most existing methods distinguish them based on feature columns, which cannot represent the complex coupling relationship between semantic and style information. In this paper, we propose PICO, a novel framework for suppressing style interference during embedding interaction. Specifically, we quantify the probability of each feature column representing semantic information, and regard it as the weight during the embedding interaction. To ensure the reliability of the semantic probability, we propose a prototype iterative construction method. The key operation of this method is a performance feedback-based weighting function, and we have theoretically proven that the function can assign higher weight to prototypes that bring higher performance improvements. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks and model backbones demonstrate the superiority of PICO, outperforming state-of-the-art methods by 5.2%-14.1%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  7. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,230
  8. 2018Stacked Cross Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 416
  9. 2017Sampling Matters in Deep Embedding Learningcited by 285
  10. 2021Seeing Out of tHe bOx: End-to-End Pre-training for Vision-Language Representation Learningcited by 187
  11. 2021Evo-ViT: Slow-Fast Token Evolution for Dynamic Vision Transformercited by 177
  12. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 151
7 more
  1. 2015Learning Deep Structure-Preserving Image-Text Embeddingscited by 139
  2. 2020Learning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embeddingcited by 137
  3. 2021Similarity Reasoning and Filtration for Image-Text Matchingcited by 121
  4. 2020IMRAM: Iterative Matching with Recurrent Attention Memory for Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrievalcited by 115
  5. 2021Text to Image Generation with Semantic-Spatial Aware GANcited by 53
  6. 2020Learning Dual Semantic Relations with Graph Attention for Image-Text Matchingcited by 30
  7. 2019Image-Question-Answer Synergistic Network for Visual Dialogcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.