mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PruneGCRN: Minimizing and explaining spatio-temporal problems through node pruning

arXiv 2510.10803 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work addresses the challenge of using a deep learning model to prune graphs and the ability of this method to integrate explainability into spatio-temporal problems through a new approach. Instead of applying explainability to the model's behavior, we seek to gain a better understanding of the problem itself. To this end, we propose a novel model that integrates an optimized pruning mechanism capable of removing nodes from the graph during the training process, rather than doing so as a separate procedure. This integration allows the architecture to learn how to minimize prediction error while selecting the most relevant nodes. Thus, during training, the model searches for the most relevant subset of nodes, obtaining the most important elements of the problem, facilitating its analysis. To evaluate the proposed approach, we used several widely used traffic datasets, comparing the accuracy obtained by pruning with the model and with other methods. The experiments demonstrate that our method is capable of retaining a greater amount of information as the graph reduces in size compared to the other methods used. These results highlight the potential of pruning as a tool for developing models capable of simplifying spatio-temporal problems, thereby obtaining their most important elements.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 44 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  5. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  6. 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
  7. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,136
  8. 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 860
  9. 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 829
  10. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
  11. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 584
  12. 2020Adaptive Graph Convolutional Recurrent Network for Traffic Forecastingcited by 530
11 more
  1. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 384
  2. 2021Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Surveycited by 261
  3. 2020Spatial-Temporal Fusion Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 213
  4. 2021Spatial-Temporal Graph ODE Networks for Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 210
  5. 2021ProtGNN: Towards Self-Explaining Graph Neural Networkscited by 96
  6. 2022GraphFramEx: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networkscited by 58
  7. 2022Rethinking Attention-Model Explainability through Faithfulness Violation Testcited by 43
  8. 2017Diffusion Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network: Data-Driven Traffic Forecastingcited by 41
  9. 2020Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?cited by 41
  10. 2021Probing GNN Explainers: A Rigorous Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of GNN Explanation Methodscited by 36
  11. 2022Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: An Experimental Surveycited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.