Answer-Consistent Chain-of-thought Reinforcement Learning For Multi-modal Large Langauge Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can significantly enhance reasoning abilities by directly optimizing correctness, rather than relying solely on supervised imitation. This paradigm has been extended to multimodal LLMs for complex video and image understanding tasks. However, while outcome-driven RL improves answer accuracy, it can inadvertently decouple the reasoning chain from the final answer, leading to situations where models produce inconsistency between the reasoning trace and final answer. In our experiments on multiple-choice visual question-answering tasks, the standard GRPO method yields only 79.7% consistency on MMVU between the reasoning steps and the chosen answers, indicating frequent mismatches between answers and reasoning. To this end, we propose Answer-Consistent Reinforcement Learning (ACRE) that modifies the GRPO algorithm with an auxiliary consistency check. After the model generates a chain of thought and an initial answer for a given question, we shuffle the answer options and prompt the model again with the same reasoning trace to predict a second answer. We design a consistency-verification reward that grants a high reward only if both the original and the post-shuffle answers agree and are correct; otherwise, a lower reward is assigned accordingly. This mechanism penalizes reasoning-answer misalignment and discourages the model from relying on spurious patterns, such as option ordering biases. We evaluate ACRE on challenging Video Reasoning benchmarks and multimodal math reasoning benchmarks, achieving an average 2.2% and 1.5% improvement for Video Reasoning and Math Reasoning tasks over the GRPO baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 21 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2025.
Builds on
21 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Video-R1: Reinforcing Video Reasoning in MLLMs27 Mar
- 2025Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Models9 Mar
- 2025Visual-RFT: Visual Reinforcement Fine-Tuning3 Mar
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts3 Oct
- 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering20 Sep
Other references · 16
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,720
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,413
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
4 more
- 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 562
- 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 363
- 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 356
- 2025MMVU: Measuring Expert-Level Multi-Discipline Video Understandingcited by 137
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal Reasoningcited by 11
- 2025PuzzleCraft: Exploration-Aware Curriculum Learning for Puzzle-Based RLVR in VLMscited by 4
- 2026Prioritizing the Best: Incentivizing Reliable Multimodal Reasoning by Rewarding Beyond Answer Correctnesscited by 2
- 2026MM-THEBench: Do Reasoning MLLMs Think Reasonably?cited by 1
- 2026SoftmaxGRPO: Learning to Reason using Softmax Advantage Group Estimationcited by 1
- 2026CORA: Analyzing and bridging thinking-answer gap in Multimodal RLVR via Consistency-Oriented Reasoning Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Stable Scores, Unstable Answers: Frame Phase and Option Order in Video Multiple-Choice Evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Stable Scores, Unstable Answers: Frame Phase and Option Order in Video Multiple-Choice Evaluation6 Oct 2026
- 2026SoftmaxGRPO: Learning to Reason using Softmax Advantage Group Estimation10 Aug 2026
- 2026CORA: Analyzing and bridging thinking-answer gap in Multimodal RLVR via Consistency-Oriented Reasoning Alignment12 Jun 2026
- 2026Prioritizing the Best: Incentivizing Reliable Multimodal Reasoning by Rewarding Beyond Answer Correctness20 Apr 2026
- 2026MM-THEBench: Do Reasoning MLLMs Think Reasonably?30 Jan 2026
- 2025PuzzleCraft: Exploration-Aware Curriculum Learning for Puzzle-Based RLVR in VLMs16 Dec 2025
- 2025AutoRubric: Rubric-Based Generative Rewards for Faithful Multimodal Reasoning16 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GRPO-CARE: Consistency-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
- 2025TACO: Think-Answer Consistency for Optimized Long-Chain Reasoning and Efficient Data Learning via Reinforcement Learning in LVLMs
- 2025Enhancing the Outcome Reward-based RL Training of MLLMs with Self-Consistency Sampling
- 2025Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
- 2026On Robustness and Chain-of-Thought Consistency of RL-Finetuned VLMs
- 2026Be Faithful When Response: Returning Fluent and Grounded Answers for Vision-Language Models Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Aligning Thoughts with Answers: Probability Rewards to Tame Thinking Drift