Provable Training Data Identification for Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Identifying training data of large-scale models is critical for copyright litigation, privacy auditing, and ensuring fair evaluation. However, existing works typically treat this task as an instance-wise identification without controlling the error rate of the identified set, which cannot provide statistically reliable evidence. In this work, we formalize training data identification as a set-level inference problem and propose Provable Training Data Identification (PTDI), a distribution-free approach that enables provable and strict false identification rate control. Specifically, our method computes conformal p-values for each data point using a set of known unseen data and then develops a novel Jackknife-corrected Beta boundary (JKBB) estimator to estimate the training-data proportion of the test set, which allows us to scale these p-values. By applying the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure to the scaled p-values, we select a subset of data points with provable and strict false identification control. Extensive experiments across various models and datasets demonstrate that PTDI achieves higher power than prior methods while strictly controlling the FIR.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.
Builds on
45 of 69 references.
References · 45
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,689
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,308
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
- 2022GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Modelcited by 711
- 2018ML-Leaks: Model and Data Independent Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses on Machine Learning Modelscited by 475
- 2023Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 375
33 more
- 2023NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmarkcited by 339
- 2020Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Modelscited by 273
- 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 265
- 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Language Models via Neighbourhood Comparisoncited by 249
- 2021Enhanced Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 237
- 2022Data Contamination: From Memorization to Exploitationcited by 234
- 2023Proving Test Set Contamination in Black Box Language Modelscited by 227
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 224
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2021Testing for Outliers with Conformal p-valuescited by 133
- 2024Generalization or Memorization: Data Contamination and Trustworthy Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 119
- 2023Low-Cost High-Power Membership Inference Attackscited by 99
- 2023Practical Membership Inference Attacks against Fine-tuned Large Language Models via Self-prompt Calibrationcited by 90
- 2024DE-COP: Detecting Copyrighted Content in Language Models Training Datacited by 72
- 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 66
- 2023Scalable Membership Inference Attacks via Quantile Regressioncited by 61
- 2024ReCaLL: Membership Inference via Relative Conditional Log-Likelihoodscited by 61
- 2023LatestEval: Addressing Data Contamination in Language Model Evaluation through Dynamic and Time-Sensitive Test Constructioncited by 57
- 2024Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Methodcited by 54
- 2023Conformal Prediction for Deep Classifier via Label Rankingcited by 52
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks Cannot Prove that a Model Was Trained On Your Datacited by 49
- 2023Estimating Contamination via Perplexity: Quantifying Memorisation in Language Model Evaluationcited by 47
- 2024MMLU-CF: A Contamination-free Multi-task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 41
- 2024ConStat: Performance-Based Contamination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2024Membership Inference Attacks against Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 31
- 2023Model-free selective inference under covariate shift via weighted conformal p-valuescited by 26
- 2023CLEAN-EVAL: Clean Evaluation on Contaminated Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2024TorchCP: A Python Library for Conformal Predictioncited by 9
- 2025Multivariate Conformal Selectioncited by 8
- 2024C-Adapter: Adapting Deep Classifiers for Efficient Conformal Prediction Setscited by 7
- 2024Fine-tuning can Help Detect Pretraining Data from Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Multi-Condition Conformal Selectioncited by 4
- 2025How does Bayesian Sampling help Membership Inference Attacks?cited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.