mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quality Estimation Reranking for Document-Level Translation

arXiv 2510.08870 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Quality estimation (QE) reranking is a form of quality-aware decoding which aims to improve machine translation (MT) by scoring and selecting the best candidate from a pool of generated translations. While known to be effective at the sentence level, its application to the increasingly prominent domain of document-level translation remains underexplored. In this work, we evaluate QE reranking performance on document-level (rather than the typical sentence-level) translation, using various learned and large language model (LLM)-based QE metrics. We find that with our best learned metric, SLIDE, BLEURT-20 scores improve by +2.00 with only two candidates, and by +5.09 with 32, across both decoder-only LLM models and encoder-decoder neural machine translation (NMT) models. Using the best LLM-based metric, GEMBA-DA, gains of +1.63 and +4.30 are achieved under the same conditions. Although gains shrink with longer inputs, reranking with 32 candidates yields improvements of +2.34 (SLIDE) and +1.40 (GEMBA-DA) on our longest documents (512-1024 source tokens). These findings demonstrate the practical value of document-level QE, with minimal runtime overhead given suitable translation models and hardware.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2025.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  2. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  3. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  4. 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 338
  5. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  6. 2020InfoXLM: An Information-Theoretic Framework for Cross-Lingual Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 237
  7. 2020Is MAP Decoding All You Need? The Inadequacy of the Mode in Neural Machine Translationcited by 138
  8. 2025Why do LLMs attend to the first token?cited by 127
  9. 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
  10. 2023Large language models effectively leverage document-level context for literary translation, but critical errors persistcited by 80
  11. 2023Epsilon Sampling Rocks: Investigating Sampling Strategies for Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding for Machine Translationcited by 58
  12. 2020Unbabel's Participation in the WMT20 Metrics Shared Taskcited by 56
4 more
  1. 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  2. 2022Embarrassingly Easy Document-Level MT Metrics: How to Convert Any Pretrained Metric Into a Document-Level Metriccited by 56
  3. 2024Don't Rank, Combine! Combining Machine Translation Hypotheses Using Quality Estimationcited by 13
  4. 2023SLIDE: Reference-free Evaluation for Machine Translation using a Sliding Document Windowcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.