mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Alignment Waltz: Jointly Training Agents to Collaborate for Safety

arXiv 2510.08240 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 10

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Harnessing the power of LLMs requires a delicate dance between being helpful and harmless. This creates a fundamental tension between two competing challenges: vulnerability to adversarial attacks that elicit unsafe content, and a tendency for overrefusal on benign but sensitive prompts. Current approaches often navigate this dance with safeguard models that completely reject any content that contains unsafe portions. This approach cuts the music entirely-it may exacerbate overrefusals and fails to provide nuanced guidance for queries it refuses. To teach models a more coordinated choreography, we propose WaltzRL, a novel multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that formulates safety alignment as a collaborative, positive-sum game. WaltzRL jointly trains a conversation agent and a feedback agent, where the latter is incentivized to provide useful suggestions that improve the safety and helpfulness of the conversation agent's responses. At the core of WaltzRL is a Dynamic Improvement Reward (DIR) that evolves over time based on how well the conversation agent incorporates the feedback. At inference time, unsafe or overrefusing responses from the conversation agent are improved rather than discarded. The feedback agent is deployed together with the conversation agent and only engages adaptively when needed, preserving helpfulness and low latency on safe queries. Our experiments, conducted across five diverse datasets, demonstrate that WaltzRL significantly reduces both unsafe responses (e.g., from 39.0% to 4.6% on WildJailbreak) and overrefusals (from 45.3% to 9.9% on OR-Bench) compared to various baselines. By enabling the conversation and feedback agents to co-evolve and adaptively apply feedback, WaltzRL enhances LLM safety without degrading general capabilities, thereby advancing the Pareto front between helpfulness and harmlessness.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 38 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2025.

Builds on

38 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attacks2 Mar

Other references · 37

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  8. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  9. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  10. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  11. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 488
  12. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
25 more
  1. 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 460
  2. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
  3. 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
  4. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  5. 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 337
  6. 2024Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Modelscited by 292
  7. 2024SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusalcited by 224
  8. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 222
  9. 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 206
  10. 2025Constitutional Classifiers: Defending against Universal Jailbreaks across Thousands of Hours of Red Teamingcited by 172
  11. 2025SWEET-RL: Training Multi-Turn LLM Agents on Collaborative Reasoning Taskscited by 108
  12. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
  13. 2024The Language Barrier: Dissecting Safety Challenges of LLMs in Multilingual Contextscited by 92
  14. 2023Scalable AI Safety via Doubly-Efficient Debatecited by 54
  15. 2023Self-Guard: Empower the LLM to Safeguard Itselfcited by 52
  16. 2024PRP: Propagating Universal Perturbations to Attack Large Language Model Guard-Railscited by 49
  17. 2025From Hard Refusals to Safe-Completions: Toward Output-Centric Safety Trainingcited by 49
  18. 2024Controllable Safety Alignment: Inference-Time Adaptation to Diverse Safety Requirementscited by 35
  19. 2025Chasing Moving Targets with Online Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for Safer Language Modelscited by 33
  20. 2024Scalable Reinforcement Post-Training Beyond Static Human Prompts: Evolving Alignment via Asymmetric Self-Playcited by 21
  21. 2025Putting the Value Back in RL: Better Test-Time Scaling by Unifying LLM Reasoners With Verifierscited by 14
  22. 2024Toward Optimal LLM Alignments Using Two-Player Gamescited by 13
  23. 2024ChatGPT Doesn't Trust Chargers Fans: Guardrail Sensitivity in Contextcited by 9
  24. 2025RedDebate: Safer Responses Through Multi-Agent Red Teaming Debatescited by 7
  25. 2025Jailbreak Distillation: Renewable Safety Benchmarkingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 9.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Agent Safety Alignment via Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Learning When to Act or Refuse: Guarding Agentic Reasoning Models for Safe Multi-Step Tool Use
  3. 2025AgentAlign: Navigating Safety Alignment in the Shift from Informative to Agentic Large Language Models
  4. 2026MAGIC: A Co-Evolving Attacker-Defender Adversarial Game for Robust LLM Safety
  5. 2025AlphaAlign: Incentivizing Safety Alignment with Extremely Simplified Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026TriPlay-RL: Tri-Role Self-Play Reinforcement Learning for LLM Safety Alignment
  7. 2025SpeakRL: Synergizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting in Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Safety of Latent Communication in Multi-Agent Systems