Vocabulary embeddings organize linguistic structure early in language model training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) work by manipulating the geometry of input embedding vectors over multiple layers. Here, we ask: how are the input vocabulary representations of language models structured, and how and when does this structure evolve over training? To answer this question, we use representational similarity analysis, running a suite of experiments that correlate the geometric structure of the input embeddings and output embeddings of two open-source models (Pythia 12B and OLMo 7B) with semantic, syntactic, and frequency-based metrics over the course of training. Our key findings are as follows: 1) During training, the vocabulary embedding geometry quickly converges to high correlations with a suite of semantic and syntactic features; 2) Embeddings of high-frequency and function words (e.g., "the," "of") converge to their final vectors faster than lexical and low-frequency words, which retain some alignment with the bias in their random initializations. These findings help map the dynamic trajectory by which input embeddings organize around linguistic structure, revealing distinct roles for word frequency and function. Our findings motivate a deeper study of how the evolution of vocabulary geometry may facilitate specific capability gains during model training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
31 of 68 references.
References · 31
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2024OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Modelscited by 599
- 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 504
- 2020Universal Dependencies v2: An Evergrowing Multilingual Treebank Collectioncited by 269
- 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
- 2021CANINE: Pre-training an Efficient Tokenization-Free Encoder for Language Representationcited by 229
- 2022Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Modelscited by 218
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
- 2023Sudden Drops in the Loss: Syntax Acquisition, Phase Transitions, and Simplicity Bias in MLMscited by 121
19 more
- 2023XLM-V: Overcoming the Vocabulary Bottleneck in Multilingual Masked Language Modelscited by 88
- 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 87
- 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
- 2018Towards Understanding Linear Word Analogiescited by 57
- 2024Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Modelscited by 45
- 2023Improving Language Plasticity via Pretraining with Active Forgettingcited by 43
- 2025Over-Tokenized Transformer: Vocabulary is Generally Worth Scalingcited by 42
- 2024MAGNET: Improving the Multilingual Fairness of Language Models with Adaptive Gradient-Based Tokenizationcited by 31
- 2024Backward Lens: Projecting Language Model Gradients into the Vocabulary Spacecited by 30
- 2024MrT5: Dynamic Token Merging for Efficient Byte-level Language Modelscited by 27
- 2022Overlap-based Vocabulary Generation Improves Cross-lingual Transfer Among Related Languagescited by 25
- 2022When classifying grammatical role, BERT doesn't care about word order... except when it matterscited by 24
- 2019Correlation Coefficients and Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 20
- 2020Reusing a Pretrained Language Model on Languages with Limited Corpora for Unsupervised NMTcited by 18
- 2020Picking BERT's Brain: Probing for Linguistic Dependencies in Contextualized Embeddings Using Representational Similarity Analysiscited by 18
- 2024Token Erasure as a Footprint of Implicit Vocabulary Items in LLMscited by 17
- 2021Which transformer architecture fits my data? A vocabulary bottleneck in self-attentioncited by 16
- 2024Retrofitting Large Language Models with Dynamic Tokenizationcited by 15
- 2022Oolong: Investigating What Makes Transfer Learning Hard with Controlled Studiescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.