mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Which transformer architecture fits my data? A vocabulary bottleneck in self-attention

arXiv 2105.03928 ↗First posted 9 May 2021cs.LG cs.CLcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

After their successful debut in natural language processing, Transformer architectures are now becoming the de-facto standard in many domains. An obstacle for their deployment over new modalities is the architectural configuration: the optimal depth-to-width ratio has been shown to dramatically vary across data types (e.g., 10x larger over images than over language). We theoretically predict the existence of an embedding rank bottleneck that limits the contribution of self-attention width to the Transformer expressivity. We thus directly tie the input vocabulary size and rank to the optimal depth-to-width ratio, since a small vocabulary size or rank dictates an added advantage of depth over width. We empirically demonstrate the existence of this bottleneck and its implications on the depth-to-width interplay of Transformer architectures, linking the architecture variability across domains to the often glossed-over usage of different vocabulary sizes or embedding ranks in different domains. As an additional benefit, our rank bottlenecking framework allows us to identify size redundancies of 25%-50% in leading NLP models such as ALBERT and T5.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2021.

Builds on

34 of 56 references.

References · 34

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
  8. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  9. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  10. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  11. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,818
  12. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
22 more
  1. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  2. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  3. 2020Jukebox: A Generative Model for Musiccited by 542
  4. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  5. 2019Analysing Mathematical Reasoning Abilities of Neural Modelscited by 335
  6. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 272
  7. 2019Scaling Autoregressive Video Modelscited by 190
  8. 2017Breaking the Softmax Bottleneck: A High-Rank RNN Language Modelcited by 152
  9. 2019On Identifiability in Transformerscited by 116
  10. 2019Learning to Deceive with Attention-Based Explanationscited by 111
  11. 2020Low-Rank Bottleneck in Multi-head Attention Modelscited by 89
  12. 2019Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systemscited by 64
  13. 2020PMI-Masking: Principled masking of correlated spanscited by 54
  14. 2016Inductive Bias of Deep Convolutional Networks through Pooling Geometrycited by 53
  15. 2019Improving Transformer Models by Reordering their Sublayerscited by 52
  16. 2018Quantum Entanglement in Deep Learning Architecturescited by 50
  17. 2020The Depth-to-Width Interplay in Self-Attentioncited by 42
  18. 2016Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Modelcited by 31
  19. 2017Deep Learning and Quantum Entanglement: Fundamental Connections with Implications to Network Designcited by 24
  20. 2020Normalized Attention Without Probability Cagecited by 20
  21. 2017On the Long-Term Memory of Deep Recurrent Networkscited by 14
  22. 2017Analysis and Design of Convolutional Networks via Hierarchical Tensor Decompositionscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 7; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area: