UAV-OVO: Out-of-Viewpoint Generalization in UAV Action Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
UAV action recognition faces a deployment shift that standard benchmarks often obscure: a model trained on UAV footage captured from low-depression viewpoints may be required to recognize the same action classes from high-depression viewpoints. While the action labels remain unchanged, this shift alters body visibility, motion projection, and scene context, encouraging models to rely on viewpoint-specific shortcuts. We introduce UAV-OVO, an Out-of-Viewpoint generalization benchmark for UAV action recognition. UAV-OVO derives view scores from uncalibrated videos, uses a view-isolation band to assign low-depression videos to the training and in-distribution test splits while reserving high-depression videos for out-of-distribution testing, and constructs ID/OOD test sets matched by class distribution so that performance differences reflect viewpoint shift rather than label imbalance. Across representative video recognizers, UAV-OVO reveals a substantial ID/OOD gap: models that fit the low-depression training distribution well often fail to transfer to held-out high-depression views, exposing viewpoint shortcuts hidden by aggregate accuracy. We further propose LATER, LoRA-Anchored Test-time Re-centering, which first adapts the recognizer with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and then uses the learned LoRA subspace as a semantic anchor for online feature re-centering. Specifically, LATER projects target-domain displacement onto the orthogonal complement of the LoRA subspace before re-centering features, reducing viewpoint-induced drift while preserving task-relevant semantics. Together, UAV-OVO and LATER provide a controlled testbed and a practical adaptation method for viewpoint-robust UAV video understanding.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
44 of 56 references.
References · 44
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
- 2021ViViT: A Video Vision Transformercited by 1,620
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
32 more
- 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
- 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
- 2021Video Swin Transformercited by 1,091
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
- 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 986
- 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
- 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2025Depth Anything 3: Recovering the Visual Space from Any Viewscited by 692
- 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 637
- 2022Continual Test-Time Domain Adaptationcited by 525
- 2021MViTv2: Improved Multiscale Vision Transformers for Classification and Detectioncited by 519
- 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 469
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 415
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
- 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
- 2024Video Mamba Suite: State Space Model as a Versatile Alternative for Video Understandingcited by 108
- 2021UAV-Human: A Large Benchmark for Human Behavior Understanding with Unmanned Aerial Vehiclescited by 96
- 2017Okutama-Action: An Aerial View Video Dataset for Concurrent Human Action Detectioncited by 46
- 2023COCO-O: A Benchmark for Object Detectors under Natural Distribution Shiftscited by 34
- 2019SpaceNet MVOI: a Multi-View Overhead Imagery Datasetcited by 29
- 2022Ray3D: ray-based 3D human pose estimation for monocular absolute 3D localizationcited by 25
- 2022FAR: Fourier Aerial Video Recognitioncited by 10
- 2023AZTR: Aerial Video Action Recognition with Auto Zoom and Temporal Reasoningcited by 8
- 2025NEO: No-Optimization Test-Time Adaptation through Latent Re-Centeringcited by 8
- 2025Benchmarking Object Detectors under Real-World Distribution Shifts in Satellite Imagerycited by 2
- 2025DejaVid: Encoder-Agnostic Learned Temporal Matching for Video Classificationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.