mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Langevin Thompson Sampling from A Stochastic Approximation Perspective

arXiv 2510.05023 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing approximate Thompson Sampling (TS) algorithms for multi-armed bandits use Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) or its variants in each round to sample from the posterior, relaxing the need for conjugacy assumptions between priors and reward distributions in vanilla TS. However, they often require approximating a different posterior distribution in different round of the bandit problem. This requires tricky, round-specific tuning of hyperparameters such as dynamic learning rates, causing challenges in both theoretical analysis and practical implementation. To alleviate this non-stationarity, we introduce TS-SA, which incorporates stochastic approximation (SA) within the TS framework. In each round, TS-SA constructs a posterior approximation only using the most recent reward(s), performs a Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) update, and applies an SA step to average noisy proposals over time. This can be interpreted as approximating a stationary posterior target throughout the entire algorithm, which further yields a fixed step-size, a unified convergence analysis framework, and improved posterior estimates through temporal averaging. We establish near-optimal regret bounds for TS-SA, with a simplified and more intuitive theoretical analysis enabled by interpreting the entire algorithm as a simulation of a stationary SGLD process. Our empirical results demonstrate that even a single-step Langevin update with certain warm-up outperforms existing methods substantially on bandit tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2025.

Builds on

24 of 51 references.

References · 24

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  2. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  3. 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 206
  4. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 165
  5. 2019A Short Note on Concentration Inequalities for Random Vectors with SubGaussian Normcited by 105
  6. 2019Randomized Exploration in Generalized Linear Banditscited by 70
  7. 2017Ensemble Samplingcited by 62
  8. 2019Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 57
  9. 2016On Explore-Then-Commit Strategiescited by 46
  10. 2013Thompson Sampling for 1-Dimensional Exponential Family Banditscited by 41
  11. 2022Finite-time High-probability Bounds for Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Iterates of Linear Stochastic Approximationcited by 41
  12. 2023Provable and Practical: Efficient Exploration in Reinforcement Learning via Langevin Monte Carlocited by 29
12 more
  1. 2020MOTS: Minimax Optimal Thompson Samplingcited by 28
  2. 2022An Analysis of Ensemble Samplingcited by 23
  3. 2022Langevin Monte Carlo for Contextual Banditscited by 22
  4. 2024Randomized Exploration in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  5. 2024More Efficient Randomized Exploration for Reinforcement Learning via Approximate Samplingcited by 12
  6. 2022Finite-Time Regret of Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Exponential Family Multi-Armed Banditscited by 11
  7. 2024Accelerating Approximate Thompson Sampling with Underdamped Langevin Monte Carlocited by 10
  8. 2023Ensemble sampling for linear bandits: small ensembles sufficecited by 7
  9. 2020On Thompson Sampling with Langevin Algorithmscited by 6
  10. 2024Improved Regret of Linear Ensemble Samplingcited by 6
  11. 2023Langevin Thompson Sampling with Logarithmic Communication: Bandits and Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  12. 2023VITS : Variational Inference Thompson Sampling for contextual banditscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.