mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Attack via Overfitting: 10-shot Benign Fine-tuning to Jailbreak LLMs

arXiv 2510.02833 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2025cs.CRcited by 10

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Despite substantial efforts in safety alignment, recent research indicates that Large Language Models (LLMs) remain highly susceptible to jailbreak attacks. Among these attacks, finetuning-based ones that compromise LLMs' safety alignment via fine-tuning stand out due to its stable jailbreak performance. In particular, a recent study indicates that fine-tuning with as few as 10 harmful question-answer (QA) pairs can lead to successful jailbreaking across various harmful questions. However, such malicious fine-tuning attacks are readily detectable and hence thwarted by moderation models. In this paper, we demonstrate that LLMs can be jailbroken by fine-tuning with only 10 benign QA pairs; our attack exploits the increased sensitivity of LLMs to fine-tuning data after being overfitted. Specifically, our fine-tuning process starts with overfitting an LLM via fine-tuning with benign QA pairs involving identical refusal answers. Further fine-tuning is then performed with standard benign answers, causing the overfitted LLM to forget the refusal attitude and thus provide compliant answers regardless of the harmfulness of a question. We implement our attack on the ten LLMs and compare it with five existing baselines. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves significant advantages in both attack effectiveness and attack stealth. Our findings expose previously unreported security vulnerabilities in current LLMs and provide a new perspective on understanding how LLMs' security is compromised, even with benign fine-tuning. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZHIXINXIE/tenBenign.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 10.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026LLM-VA: Resolving the Jailbreak-Overrefusal Trade-off via Vector Alignment
  2. 2025Beyond Jailbreaks: Revealing Stealthier and Broader LLM Security Risks Stemming from Alignment Failures
  3. 2025Reasoned Safety Alignment: Ensuring Jailbreak Defense via Answer-Then-Check
  4. 2025Jailbreaking Attacks vs. Content Safety Filters: How Far Are We in the LLM Safety Arms Race?
  5. 2024Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks
  6. 2024Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Benign Data Mirroring
  7. 2024Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing
  8. 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey