Representational Alignment Across Model Layers and Brain Regions with Multi-Level Optimal Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard representational similarity methods align each layer of a network to its best match in another independently, producing asymmetric results, lacking a global alignment score, and struggling with networks of different depths. These limitations arise from ignoring global activation structure and restricting mappings to rigid one-to-one layer correspondences. We propose Multi-Level Optimal Transport (MOT), a unified framework that jointly infers soft, globally consistent layer-to-layer couplings and neuron-level transport plans. MOT allows source neurons to distribute mass across multiple target layers while minimizing total transport cost under marginal constraints. This yields both a single alignment score for the entire network comparison and a soft transport plan that naturally handles depth mismatches through mass distribution. We evaluate MOT on vision models, large language models, and human visual cortex recordings. Across all domains, MOT matches or surpasses standard pairwise matching in alignment quality. Moreover, it reveals smooth, fine-grained hierarchical correspondences: early layers map to early layers, deeper layers maintain relative positions, and depth mismatches are resolved by distributing representations across multiple layers. These structured patterns emerge naturally from global optimization without being imposed, yet are absent in greedy layer-wise methods. MOT thus enables richer, more interpretable comparisons between representations, particularly when networks differ in architecture or depth. We further extend our method to a three-level MOT framework, providing a proof-of-concept alignment of two networks across their training trajectories and demonstrating that MOT uncovers checkpoint-wise correspondences missed by greedy layer-wise matching.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.
Builds on
11 of 32 references.
References · 11
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 362
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
- 2021Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representationscited by 109
- 2014Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Brain's Ventral Visual Pathwaycited by 93
- 2023Rosetta Neurons: Mining the Common Units in a Model Zoocited by 46
- 2023Soft Matching Distance: A metric on neural representations that captures single-neuron tuningcited by 16
- 2024Universal dimensions of visual representationcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Optimal Transport for Brain-Image Alignment: Unveiling Redundancy and Synergy in Neural Information Processing
- 2026Beyond Point-Wise Matching: Structural Representation Alignment for Accelerating Diffusion Transformers
- 2026Barycentric alignment for instance-level comparison of neural representations
- 2023Unbalancedness in Neural Monge Maps Improves Unpaired Domain Translation
- 2025SARA: Structural and Adversarial Representation Alignment for Training-efficient Diffusion Models
- 2026The Triangle of Similarity: A Multi-Faceted Framework for Comparing Neural Network Representations
- 2025REPA Works Until It Doesn't: Early-Stopped, Holistic Alignment Supercharges Diffusion Training
- 2024Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity