mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluating the Robustness of a Production Malware Detection System to Transferable Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2510.01676 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As deep learning models become widely deployed as components within larger production systems, their individual shortcomings can create system-level vulnerabilities with real-world impact. This paper studies how adversarial attacks targeting an ML component can degrade or bypass an entire production-grade malware detection system, performing a case study analysis of Gmail's pipeline where file-type identification relies on a ML model. The malware detection pipeline in use by Gmail contains a machine learning model that routes each potential malware sample to a specialized malware classifier to improve accuracy and performance. This model, called Magika, has been open sourced. By designing adversarial examples that fool Magika, we can cause the production malware service to incorrectly route malware to an unsuitable malware detector thereby increasing our chance of evading detection. Specifically, by changing just 13 bytes of a malware sample, we can successfully evade Magika in 90% of cases and thereby allow us to send malware files over Gmail. We then turn our attention to defenses, and develop an approach to mitigate the severity of these types of attacks. For our defended production model, a highly resourced adversary requires 50 bytes to achieve just a 20% attack success rate. We implement this defense, and, thanks to a collaboration with Google engineers, it has already been deployed in production for the Gmail classifier.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
  7. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  8. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  9. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  10. 2018Audio Adversarial Examples: Targeted Attacks on Speech-to-Textcited by 268
  11. 2019Imperceptible, Robust, and Targeted Adversarial Examples for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 123
  12. 2017Deep Text Classification Can be Fooledcited by 105
7 more
  1. 2018Motivating the Rules of the Game for Adversarial Example Researchcited by 57
  2. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
  3. 2020Generating Fluent Adversarial Examples for Natural Languagescited by 49
  4. 2018Did you hear that? Adversarial Examples Against Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 48
  5. 2024Magika: AI-Powered Content-Type Detectioncited by 6
  6. 2019Sitatapatra: Blocking the Transfer of Adversarial Samplescited by 4
  7. 2022Publishing Efficient On-device Models Increases Adversarial Vulnerabilitycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.