Detecting Post-generation Edits to Watermarked LLM Outputs via Combinatorial Watermarking
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
Watermarking has become a key technique for proprietary language models, enabling the distinction between AI-generated and human-written text. However, in many real-world scenarios, LLM-generated content may undergo post-generation edits, such as human revisions or even spoofing attacks, making it critical to detect and localize such modifications. In this work, we introduce a new task: detecting post-generation edits locally made to watermarked LLM outputs. To this end, we propose a combinatorial pattern-based watermarking framework, which partitions the vocabulary into disjoint subsets and embeds the watermark by enforcing a deterministic combinatorial pattern over these subsets during generation. We accompany the combinatorial watermark with a global statistic that can be used to detect the watermark. Furthermore, we design lightweight local statistics to flag and localize potential edits. We introduce two task-specific evaluation metrics, Type-I error rate and detection accuracy, and evaluate our method on open-source LLMs across a variety of editing scenarios, demonstrating strong empirical performance in edit localization.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.
Builds on
25 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Defending LLM Watermarking Against Spoofing Attacks with Contrastive Representation Learning9 Apr
- 2024Robust Detection of Watermarks for Large Language Models Under Human Edits21 Nov
- 2024A Watermark for Order-Agnostic Language Models17 Oct
- 2024Topic-Based Watermarks for Large Language Models2 Apr
- 2024WaterMax: breaking the LLM watermark detectability-robustness-quality trade-off6 Mar
- 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices25 Feb
- 2023Towards Optimal Statistical Watermarking13 Dec
- 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
- 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
- 2023Three Bricks to Consolidate Watermarks for Large Language Models26 Jul
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
- 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
3 more
Other references · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
- 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
- 2022Machine Generated Text: A Comprehensive Survey of Threat Models and Detection Methodscited by 75
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes30 Sep 2026
- 2026Stability-Aware Feature Design for Robust Watermark Detection in Machine-Generated Text9 Jun 2026
- 2025On the Detectability of LLM-Generated Text: What Exactly Is LLM-Generated Text?23 Oct 2025