mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Anchor-ECC: Local Integrity Checking for Watermarked LLM Outputs via Error-Correcting Codes

arXiv 2609.38722 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM watermarking has become an effective approach to distinguishing AI-generated text from human-written text by embedding detectable patterns during generation. However, a small post-generation edit may change the meaning of the text without removing its overall watermark signal, creating a risk that the modified content is still attributed to the original model. We propose Anchor-ECC, which incorporates the error-correcting code (ECC) constraints and explicit boundary anchors into the watermark structure and pairs them with a dynamic-programming decoder to detect and localize post-generation edits. Across Qwen3-8B, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, and OPT-125M, the approximate-hard setting achieves about 99.7% block-level true positive rate (TPR) with at most 7.6% false alarm rate (FAR) for edit detection under mixed insertions, deletions, and substitutions, while preserving the distinction between watermarked outputs and unwatermarked text. Additional quality experiments identify lower-perplexity configurations that retain strong edit-detection performance. Together, these results extend LLM watermarking from source identification to local integrity verification while supporting configurable trade-offs between detection reliability and generation quality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Detecting Post-generation Edits to Watermarked LLM Outputs via Combinatorial Watermarking2 Oct
  2. 2024Robust Detection of Watermarks for Large Language Models Under Human Edits21 Nov
  3. 2024Segmenting Watermarked Texts From Language Models28 Oct
  4. 2024A Watermark for Order-Agnostic Language Models17 Oct
  5. 2024Efficiently Identifying Watermarked Segments in Mixed-Source Texts4 Oct
  6. 2024Watermarking Language Models with Error Correcting Codes12 Jun
  7. 2024No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices25 Feb
  8. 2024Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codes14 Feb
  9. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
  10. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?17 Mar
  11. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan

Other references · 5

  1. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  2. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  3. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 278
  4. 2023On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detectioncited by 88
  5. 2024WaterSeeker: Pioneering Efficient Detection of Watermarked Segments in Large Documentscited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.