mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GPT and Prejudice: A Sparse Approach to Understanding Learned Representations in Large Language Models

arXiv 2510.01252 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are trained on massive, unstructured corpora, making it unclear which social patterns and biases they absorb and later reproduce. Existing evaluations typically examine outputs or activations, but rarely connect them back to the pre-training data. We introduce a pipeline that couples LLMs with sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to trace how different themes are encoded during training. As a controlled case study, we trained a GPT-style model on 37 nineteenth-century novels by ten female authors, a corpus centered on themes such as gender, marriage, class, and morality. By applying SAEs across layers and probing with eleven social and moral categories, we mapped sparse features to human-interpretable concepts. The analysis revealed stable thematic backbones (most prominently around gender and kinship) and showed how associations expand and entangle with depth. More broadly, we argue that the LLM+SAEs pipeline offers a scalable framework for auditing how cultural assumptions from the data are embedded in model representations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  3. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
  4. 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
  5. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
  6. 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
  7. 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
  8. 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operationscited by 141
  9. 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
  10. 2023A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Modelscited by 91
  11. 2016Improving Neural Language Models with a Continuous Cachecited by 81
  12. 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 64
14 more
  1. 2025Projecting Assumptions: The Duality Between Sparse Autoencoders and Concept Geometrycited by 58
  2. 2024Disclosure and Mitigation of Gender Bias in LLMscited by 47
  3. 2023Neuron-Level Knowledge Attribution in Large Language Modelscited by 37
  4. 2022Choose Your Lenses: Flaws in Gender Bias Evaluationcited by 29
  5. 2024Bias Unveiled: Investigating Social Bias in LLM-Generated Codecited by 25
  6. 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 22
  7. 2024Evaluating Sparse Autoencoders on Targeted Concept Erasure Taskscited by 14
  8. 2024Detecting Training Data of Large Language Models via Expectation Maximizationcited by 13
  9. 2025The Stochastic Parrot on LLM's Shoulder: A Summative Assessment of Physical Concept Understandingcited by 11
  10. 2024Investigating Representation Universality: Case Study on Genealogical Representationscited by 4
  11. 2024How far can bias go? Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignmentcited by 4
  12. 2025Investigating Bias: A Multilingual Pipeline for Generating, Solving, and Evaluating Math Problems with LLMscited by 4
  13. 2025Mechanistic Interpretability with SAEs: Probing Religion, Violence, and Geography in Large Language Modelscited by 3
  14. 2023Language-Agnostic Bias Detection in Language Models with Bias Probingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.