mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combining Large Language Models and Gradient-Free Optimization for Automatic Control Policy Synthesis

arXiv 2510.00373 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language models (LLMs) have shown promise as generators of symbolic control policies, producing interpretable program-like representations through iterative search. However, these models are not capable of separating the functional structure of a policy from the numerical values it is parametrized by, thus making the search process slow and inefficient. We propose a hybrid approach that decouples structural synthesis from parameter optimization by introducing an additional optimization layer for local parameter search. In our method, the numerical parameters of LLM-generated programs are extracted and optimized numerically to maximize task performance. With this integration, an LLM iterates over the functional structure of programs, while a separate optimization loop is used to find a locally optimal set of parameters accompanying candidate programs. We evaluate our method on a set of control tasks, showing that it achieves higher returns and improved sample efficiency compared to purely LLM-guided search. We show that combining symbolic program synthesis with numerical optimization yields interpretable yet high-performing policies, bridging the gap between language-model-guided design and classical control tuning. Our code is available at https://sites.google.com/berkeley.edu/colmo.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.

Builds on

23 of 40 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  4. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  5. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  6. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 881
  7. 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 790
  8. 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
  9. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  10. 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 492
  11. 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 484
  12. 2018Programmatically Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 192
11 more
  1. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  2. 2016DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programscited by 145
  3. 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
  4. 2022Evolution through Large Modelscited by 131
  5. 2024LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discoverycited by 82
  6. 2022Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Program Bettercited by 75
  7. 2023Interpretable Machine Learning for Science with PySR and SymbolicRegression.jlcited by 36
  8. 2018Data-efficient Auto-tuning with Bayesian Optimization: An Industrial Control Studycited by 15
  9. 2025AnalogCoder-Pro: Unifying Analog Circuit Generation and Optimization via Multi-modal LLMscited by 14
  10. 2024Synthesizing Interpretable Control Policies through Large Language Model Guided Searchcited by 3
  11. 2024Automatic Gain Tuning for Humanoid Robots Walking Architectures Using Gradient-Free Optimization Techniquescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.