mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Synthesizing Interpretable Control Policies through Large Language Model Guided Search

arXiv 2410.05406 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.AI cs.SY eess.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The combination of Large Language Models (LLMs), systematic evaluation, and evolutionary algorithms has enabled breakthroughs in combinatorial optimization and scientific discovery. We propose to extend this powerful combination to the control of dynamical systems, generating interpretable control policies capable of complex behaviors. With our novel method, we represent control policies as programs in standard languages like Python. We evaluate candidate controllers in simulation and evolve them using a pre-trained LLM. Unlike conventional learning-based control techniques, which rely on black-box neural networks to encode control policies, our approach enhances transparency and interpretability. We still take advantage of the power of large AI models, but only at the policy design phase, ensuring that all system components remain interpretable and easily verifiable at runtime. Additionally, the use of standard programming languages makes it straightforward for humans to finetune or adapt the controllers based on their expertise and intuition. We illustrate our method through its application to the synthesis of an interpretable control policy for the textitpendulum swing-up and the textitball in cup tasks. We make the code available at https://github.com/muellerlab/synthesizinginterpretablecontrolpolicies.git.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

22 of 37 references.

References · 22

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  4. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  5. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  6. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 956
  7. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
  8. 2023StarCoder: may the source be with you!cited by 799
  9. 2018QT-Opt: Scalable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Robotic Manipulationcited by 743
  10. 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 504
  11. 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 502
  12. 2022InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesiscited by 498
10 more
  1. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  2. 2024Reinforcement learningcited by 247
  3. 2023Real-World Humanoid Locomotion with Reinforcement Learningcited by 187
  4. 2022Evolution through Large Modelscited by 134
  5. 2024LLM and Simulation as Bilevel Optimizers: A New Paradigm to Advance Physical Scientific Discoverycited by 86
  6. 2022Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Program Bettercited by 78
  7. 2021A Survey on Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  8. 2018Generating Interpretable Fuzzy Controllers using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Programmingcited by 5
  9. 2020Interpretable Control by Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  10. 2023Interpretable Reinforcement Learning for Robotics and Continuous Controlcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.