mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RadOnc-GPT: An Autonomous LLM Agent for Real-Time Patient Outcomes Labeling at Scale

arXiv 2509.25540 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manual labeling limits the scale, accuracy, and timeliness of patient outcomes research in radiation oncology. We present RadOnc-GPT, an autonomous large language model (LLM)-based agent capable of independently retrieving patient-specific information, iteratively assessing evidence, and returning structured outcomes. Our evaluation explicitly validates RadOnc-GPT across two clearly defined tiers of increasing complexity: (1) a structured quality assurance (QA) tier, assessing the accurate retrieval of demographic and radiotherapy treatment plan details, followed by (2) a complex clinical outcomes labeling tier involving determination of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in head-and-neck cancer patients and detection of cancer recurrence in independent prostate and head-and-neck cancer cohorts requiring combined interpretation of structured and unstructured patient data. The QA tier establishes foundational trust in structured-data retrieval, a critical prerequisite for successful complex clinical outcome labeling.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

9 of 38 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Modelscited by 69
  2. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on a Highly-specialized Topic, Radiation Oncology Physicscited by 49
  3. 2023Radiology-GPT: A Large Language Model for Radiologycited by 44
  4. 2023Exploring the Trade-Offs: Unified Large Language Models vs Local Fine-Tuned Models for Highly-Specific Radiology NLI Taskcited by 32
  5. 2023LLM-driven Multimodal Target Volume Contouring in Radiation Oncologycited by 20
  6. 2024A recent evaluation on the performance of LLMs on radiation oncology physics using questions of randomly shuffled optionscited by 5
  7. 2024PRISM: Patient Records Interpretation for Semantic Clinical Trial Matching using Large Language Modelscited by 4
  8. 2024End-To-End Clinical Trial Matching with Large Language Modelscited by 3
  9. 2025Fine-Tuning Open-Source Large Language Models to Improve Their Performance on Radiation Oncology Tasks: A Feasibility Study to Investigate Their Potential Clinical Applications in Radiation Oncologycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025An Automated Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLaMA-4 109B-based System for Evaluating Radiotherapy Treatment Plans
  2. 2024Autonomous Artificial Intelligence Agents for Clinical Decision Making in Oncology
  3. 2025Medical AI Consensus: A Multi-Agent Framework for Radiology Report Generation and Evaluation
  4. 2025RadReason: Radiology Report Evaluation Metric with Reasons and Sub-Scores
  5. 2025Autonomous Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Using DOLA: A Privacy-Preserving, LLM-Based Optimization Agent
  6. 2024Large Language Model-Augmented Auto-Delineation of Treatment Target Volume in Radiation Therapy
  7. 2026MARCH: Multi-Agent Radiology Clinical Hierarchy for CT Report Generation
  8. 2025Benchmarking GPT-5 for Zero-Shot Multimodal Medical Reasoning in Radiology and Radiation Oncology