Internal Planning in Language Models: Characterizing Horizon and Branch Awareness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The extent to which decoder-only language models (LMs) engage in planning, that is, organizing intermediate computations to support coherent long-range generation, remains an important question, with implications for interpretability, reliability, and principled model design. Planning involves structuring computations over long horizons, and considering multiple possible continuations, but how far transformer-based LMs exhibit them without external scaffolds, e.g., chain-of-thought prompting, is unclear. We address these questions by analyzing the hidden states at the core of transformer computations, which capture intermediate results and act as carriers of information. Since these hidden representations are redundant and encumbered with fine-grained details, we develop a pipeline based on vector-quantized variational autoencoders that compresses them into compact summary codes. These codes enable measuring mutual information and analyzing the computational structure of the underlying model behavior. Using this framework, we study planning in LMs across synthetic grammar, path-finding tasks, and natural language datasets, focusing on two planning properties: (i) the planning horizon of pre-output computations, and (ii) the extent to which the model considers alternative valid continuations. As a separate downstream use of the same pipeline, we also analyze how decision-relevant information is distributed across layers and earlier prefix blocks when producing next-token predictions. Together, these analyses advance our understanding of planning in LMs and provide a general-purpose pipeline for inspecting internal model dynamics. Our results reveal that the effective planning horizon is task-dependent, that models implicitly preserve information about unused correct continuations, and that predictions draw most on recent computations, though earlier blocks remain informative.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.
Builds on
55 of 71 references.
References · 55
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
38 more
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,653
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2023Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Modelscited by 886
- 2015Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principlecited by 802
- 2018Recurrent World Models Facilitate Policy Evolutioncited by 785
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2017Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Informationcited by 503
- 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
- 2021A Survey of Transformerscited by 401
- 2024Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token Predictioncited by 360
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 316
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 311
- 2023Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learningcited by 279
- 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automatacited by 268
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
- 2023Large Language Models as Commonsense Knowledge for Large-Scale Task Planningcited by 231
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 200
- 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 162
- 2024The pitfalls of next-token predictioncited by 160
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
- 2019Adaptive Attention Span in Transformerscited by 149
- 2019The Bottom-up Evolution of Representations in the Transformer: A Study with Machine Translation and Language Modeling Objectivescited by 139
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 121
- 2023Evaluating Cognitive Maps and Planning in Large Language Models with CogEvalcited by 77
- 2024Transformers represent belief state geometry in their residual streamcited by 77
- 2023Guiding Language Model Reasoning with Planning Tokenscited by 58
- 2024Do language models plan ahead for future tokens?cited by 49
- 2022Probing Classifiers are Unreliable for Concept Removal and Detectioncited by 41
- 2025Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token predictioncited by 29
- 2024ALPINE: Unveiling the Planning Capability of Autoregressive Learning in Language Modelscited by 18
- 2023Linear Latent World Models in Simple Transformers: A Case Study on Othello-GPTcited by 16
- 2025LLMs Can Plan Only If We Tell Themcited by 15
- 2025Prompt-Reverse Inconsistency: LLM Self-Inconsistency Beyond Generative Randomness and Prompt Paraphrasingcited by 14
- 2024Representation Collapsing Problems in Vector Quantizationcited by 10
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025On the Limits of Innate Planning in Large Language Models
- 2026A Close Look At World Model Recovery In Supervised Fine-Tuned LLM Planners
- 2026The Depth Ceiling: On the Limits of Large Language Models in Discovering Latent Planning
- 2026Planning with Transformers: Chain of Computation and Structured Context Windows
- 2026Where's the Plan? Locating Latent Planning in Language Models with Lightweight Mechanistic Interventions
- 2026How Far Ahead Do LLMs Plan? Uncovering the Latent Horizon in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
- 2025Emergent Response Planning in LLMs
- 2024Non-myopic Generation of Language Models for Reasoning and Planning