NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ability to estimate the quality of scientific papers is central to how both humans and AI systems will advance scientific knowledge in the future. However, existing LLM-based estimation methods suffer from high inference cost, whereas the faster direct score regression approach is limited by scale inconsistencies. We present NAIPv2, a debiased and efficient framework for paper quality estimation. NAIPv2 employs pairwise learning within domain-year groups to reduce inconsistencies in reviewer ratings and introduces the Review Tendency Signal (RTS) as a probabilistic integration of reviewer scores and confidences. To support training and evaluation, we further construct NAIDv2, a large-scale dataset of 24,276 ICLR submissions enriched with metadata and detailed structured content. Trained on pairwise comparisons but enabling efficient pointwise prediction at deployment, NAIPv2 achieves state-of-the-art performance (78.2% AUC, 0.432 Spearman), while maintaining scalable, linear-time efficiency at inference. Notably, on unseen NeurIPS submissions, it further demonstrates strong generalization, with predicted scores increasing consistently across decision categories from Rejected to Oral. These findings establish NAIPv2 as a debiased and scalable framework for automated paper quality estimation, marking a step toward future scientific intelligence systems. Code and dataset are released at sway.cloud.microsoft/Pr42npP80MfPhvj8.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 49 references.
References · 32
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,933
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
- 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
- 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 363
- 2023GeoChat: Grounded Large Vision-Language Model for Remote Sensingcited by 328
- 2024ResearchAgent: Iterative Research Idea Generation over Scientific Literature with Large Language Modelscited by 210
- 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
- 2018A Dataset of Peer Reviews (PeerRead): Collection, Insights and NLP Applicationscited by 136
- 2024AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveyscited by 119
20 more
- 2022Curriculum Temperature for Knowledge Distillationcited by 112
- 2024MARG: Multi-Agent Review Generation for Scientific Paperscited by 104
- 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 100
- 2024PromptKD: Unsupervised Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 72
- 2024OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviewscited by 65
- 2025Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2025cited by 64
- 2021Inconsistency in Conference Peer Review: Revisiting the 2014 NeurIPS Experimentcited by 53
- 2024Automated Peer Reviewing in Paper SEA: Standardization, Evaluation, and Analysiscited by 33
- 2025Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussionscited by 23
- 2024SM3Det: A Unified Model for Multi-Modal Remote Sensing Object Detectioncited by 22
- 2024Advancing Textual Prompt Learning with Anchored Attributescited by 20
- 2024Cascade Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Model Adaptationcited by 19
- 2024From Words to Worth: Newborn Article Impact Prediction with LLMcited by 16
- 2025RSAR: Restricted State Angle Resolver and Rotated SAR Benchmarkcited by 12
- 2025From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer Reviewcited by 11
- 2025Visual Instruction Pretraining for Domain-Specific Foundation Modelscited by 9
- 2025Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Artificially Generated Scientific Researchcited by 8
- 2025Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effectscited by 5
- 2024Revisiting Prompt Pretraining of Vision-Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026AI Can Learn Scientific Tastecited by 11
- 2026CrystaL: Spontaneous Emergence of Visual Latents in MLLMscited by 6
- 2026Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Rankingcited by 0
- 2026WOW-Seg: A Word-free Open World Segmentation Modelcited by 0
- 2026WOW-Seg: A Word-free Open World Segmentation Model16 May 2026
- 2026AI Can Learn Scientific Taste15 Mar 2026
- 2026CrystaL: Spontaneous Emergence of Visual Latents in MLLMs24 Feb 2026
- 2026Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking4 Feb 2026