mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transparent, Evaluable, and Accessible Data Agents: A Proof-of-Concept Framework

arXiv 2509.24127 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.DBcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

This article presents a modular, component-based architecture for developing and evaluating AI agents that bridge the gap between natural language interfaces and complex enterprise data warehouses. The system directly addresses core challenges in data accessibility by enabling non-technical users to interact with complex data warehouses through a conversational interface, translating ambiguous user intent into precise, executable database queries to overcome semantic gaps. A cornerstone of the design is its commitment to transparent decision-making, achieved through a multi-layered reasoning framework that explains the "why" behind every decision, allowing for full interpretability by tracing conclusions through specific, activated business rules and data points. The architecture integrates a robust quality assurance mechanism via an automated evaluation framework that serves multiple functions: it enables performance benchmarking by objectively measuring agent performance against golden standards, and it ensures system reliability by automating the detection of performance regressions during updates. The agent's analytical depth is enhanced by a statistical context module, which quantifies deviations from normative behavior, ensuring all conclusions are supported by quantitative evidence including concrete data, percentages, and statistical comparisons. We demonstrate the efficacy of this integrated agent-development-with-evaluation framework through a case study on an insurance claims processing system. The agent, built on a modular architecture, leverages the BigQuery ecosystem to perform secure data retrieval, apply domain-specific business rules, and generate human-auditable justifications. The results confirm that this approach creates a robust, evaluable, and trustworthy system for deploying LLM-powered agents in data-sensitive, high-stakes domains.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025FDABench: A Benchmark for Data Agents on Analytical Queries over Heterogeneous Data
  2. 2026Data Intelligence Agents: Interpreting, Modeling, and Querying Enterprise Data via Autonomous Coding Agents
  3. 2026An Agentic Retrieval Framework for Autonomous Context-Aware Data Quality Assessment
  4. 2026DataClawEval: A Benchmark for Data Engineering Agents in Real Industrial Harness
  5. 2026Towards Trustworthy and Cost-Efficient Data Integration: From Na"ive RAG to Agentic RAG
  6. 2026A Framework for Assessing AI Agent Decisions and Outcomes in AutoML Pipelines
  7. 2026BADGER: Bridging Agentic and Deterministic Evaluation for Generative Enterprise Reasoning
  8. 2026Blue Data Intelligence Layer: Streaming Data and Agents for Multi-source Multi-modal Data-Centric Applications