mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Modality-Tailored Graph Modeling Framework for Urban Region Representation via Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2509.23772 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2025cs.CV stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph-based models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for modeling multimodal urban data and learning region representations for various downstream tasks. However, existing approaches face two major limitations. (1) They typically employ identical graph neural network architectures across all modalities, failing to capture modality-specific structures and characteristics. (2) During the fusion stage, they often neglect spatial heterogeneity by assuming that the aggregation weights of different modalities remain invariant across regions, resulting in suboptimal representations. To address these issues, we propose MTGRR, a modality-tailored graph modeling framework for urban region representation, built upon a multimodal dataset comprising point of interest (POI), taxi mobility, land use, road element, remote sensing, and street view images. (1) MTGRR categorizes modalities into two groups based on spatial density and data characteristics: aggregated-level and point-level modalities. For aggregated-level modalities, MTGRR employs a mixture-of-experts (MoE) graph architecture, where each modality is processed by a dedicated expert GNN to capture distinct modality-specific characteristics. For the point-level modality, a dual-level GNN is constructed to extract fine-grained visual semantic features. (2) To obtain effective region representations under spatial heterogeneity, a spatially-aware multimodal fusion mechanism is designed to dynamically infer region-specific modality fusion weights. Building on this graph modeling framework, MTGRR further employs a joint contrastive learning strategy that integrates region aggregated-level, point-level, and fusion-level objectives to optimize region representations. Experiments on two real-world datasets across six modalities and three tasks demonstrate that MTGRR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, validating its effectiveness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2025.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,913
  7. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
  8. 2023UrbanCLIP: Learning Text-enhanced Urban Region Profiling with Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining from the Webcited by 77
  9. 2022Multi-Graph Fusion Networks for Urban Region Embeddingcited by 32
  10. 2022Region Embedding with Intra and Inter-View Contrastive Learningcited by 24
  11. 2023Automated Spatio-Temporal Graph Contrastive Learningcited by 24
  12. 2024UrbanVLP: Multi-Granularity Vision-Language Pretraining for Urban Socioeconomic Indicator Predictioncited by 19
7 more
  1. 2024MuseCL: Predicting Urban Socioeconomic Indicators via Multi-Semantic Contrastive Learningcited by 17
  2. 2023Spatial-Temporal Graph Learning with Adversarial Contrastive Adaptationcited by 13
  3. 2023Urban Region Embedding via Multi-View Contrastive Predictioncited by 13
  4. 2023Urban Region Representation Learning with Attentive Fusioncited by 12
  5. 2024CGAP: Urban Region Representation Learning with Coarsened Graph Attention Poolingcited by 11
  6. 2024Urban Region Pre-training and Prompting: A Graph-based Approachcited by 8
  7. 2024CLCE: An Approach to Refining Cross-Entropy and Contrastive Learning for Optimized Learning Fusioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026UrbanGraphEmbeddings: Learning and Evaluating Spatially Grounded Multimodal Embeddings for Urban Science
  2. 2026UrbanMoE: A Sparse Multi-Modal Mixture-of-Experts Framework for Multi-Task Urban Region Profiling
  3. 2025UrbanLLaVA: A Multi-modal Large Language Model for Urban Intelligence with Spatial Reasoning and Understanding
  4. 2025RoadBench: Benchmarking MLLMs on Fine-Grained Spatial Understanding and Reasoning under Urban Road Scenarios
  5. 2026Designing streetscapes from street-view imagery using diffusion models
  6. 2026Modality as Heterogeneity: Node Splitting and Graph Rewiring for Multimodal Graph Learning
  7. 2026One Model, Many Graphs: Learning over Attributed Graphs across Heterogeneous Modalities with Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025Graph4MM: Weaving Multimodal Learning with Structural Information