Trajectory-Aware Information Matching for Multi-Step Gradient Inversion in Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated learning enables distributed information sharing and collaborative model training without exposing raw client data. However, shared gradients or model updates may still contain sensitive information, making federated learning vulnerable to gradient inversion attacks. Most existing gradient inversion attacks rely on simplified update observations, such as single-step gradients or endpoint-based matching. In practical FL, however, FedAvg produces an accumulated trajectory-dependent update after multiple local steps, rather than a gradient computed at a single model state.To address this issue, we propose NL-SME, a trajectory-aware information matching method for multi-step gradient inversion. NL-SME constructs a learnable nonlinear surrogate trajectory to approximate hidden local states and integrates trajectory-level information with calibrated gradient matching. For perturbed updates, NL-SME can further use an observed-update reliability-aware strategy to reduce the influence of unreliable components. Extensive experiments under diverse multi-step FedAvg settings show that NL-SME outperforms state-of-the-art gradient inversion baselines in reconstruction quality and update-matching accuracy. Additional evaluations on natural and medical images, as well as under fused-update observations and representative defense strategies, further suggest that observable multi-step updates may still retain reconstruction signals. These results reveal potential privacy leakage risks in federated information sharing. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/NL-SME-main/README.md.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2025.
Builds on
19 of 39 references.
References · 19
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019Federated Learning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directionscited by 1,538
- 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,021
- 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 792
- 2020Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?cited by 712
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 459
- 2020iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 382
- 2021See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversioncited by 326
- 2017Sparse Communication for Distributed Gradient Descentcited by 249
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
7 more
- 2022REPAIR: REnormalizing Permuted Activations for Interpolation Repaircited by 120
- 2020Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspectivecited by 94
- 2022Data Leakage in Federated Averagingcited by 26
- 2024GI-NAS: Boosting Gradient Inversion Attacks Through Adaptive Neural Architecture Searchcited by 14
- 2024SoK: On Gradient Leakage in Federated Learningcited by 12
- 2023Surrogate Model Extension (SME): A Fast and Accurate Weight Update Attack on Federated Learningcited by 11
- 2025Boosting Gradient Leakage Attacks: Data Reconstruction in Realistic FL Settingscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.